Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 6:49 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:55 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05791461
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-03-30
First Post:
2023-02-23
Brief Title:
Stress in Working Life
Sponsor:
University of Southern Denmark
Organization:
University of Southern Denmark
Study Overview
Official Title:
Stress in Working Life - Realist Evaluation of a Stress Management Intervention for Patients Referred to an Occupational Health Clinic Due to Work-related Stress
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this realist evaluation of a Danish Cognitive Behavioral Therapy CBT-based stress management for patients with work-related stress is to understand what works for whom in what circumstancesThe main objectives are
To assess the effect of the stress management intervention on sustainable return to work
To investigate what contexts and mechanisms are associated with patients return to work rates and level of perceived stress after having received the stress management intervention
To understand from a patient perspective how mechanisms work in specific contexts to generate effects of the stress management intervention
The evaluation comprises two observational studies and one interview study The intervention cohort are patients with work-related stress who received the stress management intervention between 2012-2018
The comparison cohort are patients who would have been eligible to receive the intervention in 2011-2012 however they did not receive any intervention because it was not offered at that time
In study one return to work rates are compared between the intervention cohort and the comparison cohort to find out if the intervention can help patients return to work at a faster rate
Study two will investigate if there are any explanatory variables such as work type civil status or level of depressive symptoms that may explain why some patients benefit more or less from the intervention
Study three will explore what it is about the intervention mechanisms the patients find are helping them to cope with stress or the opposite in specific circumstances
To assess the effect of the stress management intervention on sustainable return to work
To investigate what contexts and mechanisms are associated with patients return to work rates and level of perceived stress after having received the stress management intervention
To understand from a patient perspective how mechanisms work in specific contexts to generate effects of the stress management intervention
The evaluation comprises two observational studies and one interview study The intervention cohort are patients with work-related stress who received the stress management intervention between 2012-2018
The comparison cohort are patients who would have been eligible to receive the intervention in 2011-2012 however they did not receive any intervention because it was not offered at that time
In study one return to work rates are compared between the intervention cohort and the comparison cohort to find out if the intervention can help patients return to work at a faster rate
Study two will investigate if there are any explanatory variables such as work type civil status or level of depressive symptoms that may explain why some patients benefit more or less from the intervention
Study three will explore what it is about the intervention mechanisms the patients find are helping them to cope with stress or the opposite in specific circumstances
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None