Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 6:36 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:50 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05711121
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-02-15
First Post:
2023-01-09
Brief Title:
Caudal Versus S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral S1 Radiculopathy
Sponsor:
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Organization:
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Caudal Versus S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral S1 Radiculopathy
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To compare the efficacies of two different interventional techniques Caudal epidural steroid injection and S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of unilateral S1 radiculopathy
Detailed Description:
Epidural steroid injections are commonly performed for the treatment of radicular pain resulting from a disc herniation There are 3 different methods to deliver steroids to epidural area which are caudal interlaminar and transforaminal routes Lower lumbar and sacral radiculopathies can be managed with caudal epidural steroid injection which is generally quite easier to perform in comparison to transforaminal injection Transforaminal epidural injection provides injectate to reach anterior epidural area and is the most target specific technique among others In the present study investigators aim is to compare the success rates of these two different procedures regarding unilateral S1 radiculopathy The patients referring to the pain medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital for unilateral radicular pain and diagnosed S1 radiculopathy were planned to be randomized into these two different intervention groups
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None