Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 6:34 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:50 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05712811
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-02-06
First Post:
2023-01-18
Brief Title:
Comparison of Cryotherapy and Peeling Agent in the Treatment of Common Warts
Sponsor:
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Organization:
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cryotherapy Versus Topical Tricholoacetic Acid 90 in Treatment of Common Warts
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Objective To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen cryoget method versus trichloroacetic acid 90 applicator method in treatment of common warts
Study Design Randomized Control Trial Place And Duration of Study Department of Dermatology CMH Abbottabad from Jun 2022 to Nov 2022
Study Design Randomized Control Trial Place And Duration of Study Department of Dermatology CMH Abbottabad from Jun 2022 to Nov 2022
Detailed Description:
A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this investigation by non-probability consecutive sampling technique Sample size was calculated using WHO sample size calculator and patients were randomized into two equal groups A and B each comprising of 30 patients through lottery method Patients with common warts such as hard lesions raised lumps with rough surfaces at the back of their fingers around nails and palm of their hands between the ages of 18 and 60 were included whereas those with genital warts cardiac hepatic renal or hypercholesterolemia were excluded
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None