Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 6:32 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:50 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05695872
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-05-09
First Post:
2023-01-11
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures
Sponsor:
University of Alexandria
Organization:
University of Alexandria
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Best Approach to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials CONSORT guidelines The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fracture
Detailed Description:
The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial Twenty-four patients with age range of 20-50 years requiring open reduction and fixation of a fractured zygomatic complex were randomly divided into three equal groups according to the approach used
Group A subtarsal approach group Group B conventional transconjuctival approach group Group C Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach group
Group A subtarsal approach group Group B conventional transconjuctival approach group Group C Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach group
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None