Viewing Study NCT07040657


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:59 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 3:02 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07040657
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-06-27
First Post: 2025-06-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue
Sponsor: Dokuz Eylul University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Two-Point and Four-Point Cervical Injection Techniques Using Methylene Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.
Detailed Description: In recent years, Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) mapping has become a key focus in improving surgical outcomes for endometrial cancer. While methylene blue is a cost-effective option for SLN mapping, its detection rates remain suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate whether increasing the injection points from the standard 2-point to a 4-point methylene blue injection improves SLN mapping success.

This randomized controlled trial will include patients with preoperative stage I endometrial carcinoma. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection, and the other group will receive a 4-point injection.

The primary endpoint is the difference in SLN detection rates between the two techniques. Findings from this study will provide detailed insights into whether the 4-point injection offers a significant advantage over the standard 2-point method.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: