Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:59 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 8:33 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04946357
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-01-05
First Post:
2021-06-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Neoadjuvant Irradiation of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Ions
Sponsor:
University Hospital Heidelberg
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Neoadjuvant Irradiation of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Ions
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
EXTREM ION
Brief Summary:
This randomized prospective open-label phase 2 trial testes the safety and feasibility of a hypofractionated accelerated neoadjuvant proton or carbon ion radiotherapy based on the rate of wound healing disorders from beginning of radiotherapy to maximum 120 days after the planned tumor resection or discontinuation of treatment due to any reason. The treatment is of shorter duration (2-3 weeks vs. 5 weeks standard treatment), which should please most patients and thus enhance quality of life. The treatment regimen furthermore promises a reduced rate of late side effects and significant optimization of the current treatment standards. A phase II trial is mandatory not only for obtaining the safety and feasibility data, but also in order to prepare a concurrent phase III trial. Due to the low incidence of soft tissue sarcoma, only a well prepared multicenter study has a chance to be successfully completed based on previous experiences in trials for seldom tumor entities.
Detailed Description:
Oncologic complete local excision (wide resection) combined with radiotherapy forms the standard treatment for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Especially patients with G2/G3 sarcomas profit from the combination of radiotherapy and surgery. Well-differentiated sarcomas (G1) after total resection (R0) receive no subsequent treatment besides surgery. The sequence of surgery and radiation therapy is widely discussed by the radiation oncologists and surgeons. The main advantages of neoadjuvant (pre-operative) radiotherapy are the smaller treatment target volumes and reduced prescribed radiation doses of 50 Gy vs. 66 Gy (postoperative) in 2 Gy single doses. Thus, due to these reductions in volumes and dose, neoadjuvant radiotherapy is associated with a lower rate of radiotherapy-associated edema and fibrosis. However, a randomized phase III study showed an increased rate of wound healing complications in patients with neoadjuvant radiotherapy compared to adjuvant (post-operative) radiotherapy (35% vs. 17%). For this reason, adjuvant radiotherapy in is currently preferred in cases with good operability.
Particle therapy bears the chance to utilize the advantages of preoperative radiotherapy without compromising wound healing. The advantages of tumor treatment by ion therapy are based on their special biological and physical features. Protons and carbons ion lead to an improved dose distribution compared to photons which allows an improved sparing of the neighboring risk organs and at the same time an escalation of the dose prescribed to the tumor. Carbon ions are furthermore superior to protons by biological advantages based on their enhanced biological effectivity. In general, heavy ions are considered as a good treatment option for tumors of low radiosensitivity as sarcomas. Superior survival and decreased toxicity rates are expected from the use of protons and carbon ions.
This randomized prospective open-label phase 2 trial testes the safety and feasibility of a hypofractionated accelerated neoadjuvant proton or carbon ion radiotherapy based on the rate of wound healing disorders from beginning of radiotherapy to maximum 120 days after the planned tumor resection or discontinuation of treatment due to any reason. The treatment is of shorter duration (2-3 weeks vs. 5 weeks standard treatment), which should please most patients and thus enhance quality of life. The treatment regimen furthermore promises a reduced rate of late side effects and significant optimization of the current treatment standards. A phase II trial is mandatory not only for obtaining the safety and feasibility data, but also in order to prepare a concurrent phase III trial. Due to the low incidence of soft tissue sarcoma, only a well prepared multicenter study has a chance to be successfully completed based on previous experiences in trials for seldom tumor entities.
Particle therapy bears the chance to utilize the advantages of preoperative radiotherapy without compromising wound healing. The advantages of tumor treatment by ion therapy are based on their special biological and physical features. Protons and carbons ion lead to an improved dose distribution compared to photons which allows an improved sparing of the neighboring risk organs and at the same time an escalation of the dose prescribed to the tumor. Carbon ions are furthermore superior to protons by biological advantages based on their enhanced biological effectivity. In general, heavy ions are considered as a good treatment option for tumors of low radiosensitivity as sarcomas. Superior survival and decreased toxicity rates are expected from the use of protons and carbon ions.
This randomized prospective open-label phase 2 trial testes the safety and feasibility of a hypofractionated accelerated neoadjuvant proton or carbon ion radiotherapy based on the rate of wound healing disorders from beginning of radiotherapy to maximum 120 days after the planned tumor resection or discontinuation of treatment due to any reason. The treatment is of shorter duration (2-3 weeks vs. 5 weeks standard treatment), which should please most patients and thus enhance quality of life. The treatment regimen furthermore promises a reduced rate of late side effects and significant optimization of the current treatment standards. A phase II trial is mandatory not only for obtaining the safety and feasibility data, but also in order to prepare a concurrent phase III trial. Due to the low incidence of soft tissue sarcoma, only a well prepared multicenter study has a chance to be successfully completed based on previous experiences in trials for seldom tumor entities.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: