Viewing Study NCT05605288



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 6:16 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 2:45 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05605288
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-05-29
First Post: 2022-10-10

Brief Title: Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Catheterization in Patients With STEMI
Sponsor: University Hospital of Patras
Organization: University Hospital of Patras

Study Overview

Official Title: Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Catheterization in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infraction STEMI The DR-STEMI Trial
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: DR-STEMI
Brief Summary: Recently a novel distal transradial through anatomical snuffbox approach has been proposed for undertaking percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions The existing literature has evaluated distal transradial access dTRA as a feasible and safe approach with faster hemostasis lower rates of periprocedural complications and reduced incidence of radial artery occlusion RAO Aim of the present study is to compare dTRA versus conventional TRA access in patients with STEMI undergoing coronary angiography and interventions regarding peri- and post-procedural characteristics
Detailed Description: Gaining vascular access is the first mandatory step for undertaking percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions The recent guidelines published by European Society of Cardiology ESC American College of Cardiology ACC American Heart Association AHA and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions SCAI propose TRA as the gold standard for acute coronary syndromes ACS chronic coronary syndrome CCS percutaneous coronary interventions PCI Recently a novel distal transradial through anatomical snuffbox approach has been proposed The existing literature has evaluated distal transradial access dTRA as a feasible and safe approach with faster hemostasis lower rates of periprocedural complications and reduced incidence of radial artery occlusion RAO Mutual point of all the previous RCTs is that excluded patients suffering from ST-elevation Myocardial Infraction STEMI Aim of the present study is to compare dTRA versus conventional TRA access in patients with STEMI undergoing coronary angiography and interventions regarding peri- and post-procedural characteristics

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None