Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:50 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 5:24 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01979757
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-11-08
First Post:
2013-10-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Outcomes After Centrifugation Versus PureGraft for Fatgrafting to the Breast
Sponsor:
Bulovka Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Outcomes After Centrifugation Versus PureGraft for Fatgrafting to the Breast After Breast-conserving Therapy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraft device (Cytori Therapeutics, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. The investigators compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration.
Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12-30 months.To measure the subjective outcome, the investigators distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients both preoperatively and one year postoperatively. The BCCT.core software evaluated the objective outcome of breast reconstruction by fatgrafting.
Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12-30 months.To measure the subjective outcome, the investigators distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients both preoperatively and one year postoperatively. The BCCT.core software evaluated the objective outcome of breast reconstruction by fatgrafting.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 268011 | OTHER_GRANT | Grant Agency of Charles University in Prague | View |