Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 6:33 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:35 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00509392
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-07-12
First Post:
2007-07-27
Brief Title:
ClosureFAST vs Laser Ablation for the Treatment of GSV Disease A Multicenter Single-Blinded Randomized Study
Sponsor:
Medtronic Endovascular
Organization:
Medtronic Endovascular
Study Overview
Official Title:
Radiofrequency Endovenous ClosureFAST vs Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Reflux A Multicenter Single-Blinded Randomized Study RECOVERY
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RECOVERY
Brief Summary:
The objective of this post-market study is to compare the post-procedure recovery between two types of minimally invasive catheter treatments for venous disease in the Great Saphenous Vein
Detailed Description:
Comparison of the post-procedure recovery of radiofrequency RFA treatment vs laser treatment
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None