Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:44 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 8:34 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01076257
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2012-07-31
First Post:
2010-01-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy of Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy in Children With Brain Damage
Sponsor:
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy in Children With Brain Damage: Evidence of Kinematic Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This research centers on the comparison of the immediate efficacy (right after therapy) and the maintained efficacy (3 months and 6 months) between "Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" (mCIMT) group and control group at different age.
Detailed Description:
"Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" is one of the most recent treatments for children with Brain damage.
This well-designed and follow-up RCT study compared home-based CIT with a control intervention (traditional rehabilitation, TR) by combining kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation, which is possible to examine whether functional improvement is accompanied by a change in motor control. We hypothesized that home-based CIT would induce better motor control strategies (shorter RT, MT, lesser MUs, MGA, and PMGA, and larger peak velocity (PV)) for greater functional gains than TR. Furthermore, the beneficial effects would be maintained at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Findings of this study allow clinicians to understand the underlying motor control changes for functional improvement after home-based CIT.
This well-designed and follow-up RCT study compared home-based CIT with a control intervention (traditional rehabilitation, TR) by combining kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation, which is possible to examine whether functional improvement is accompanied by a change in motor control. We hypothesized that home-based CIT would induce better motor control strategies (shorter RT, MT, lesser MUs, MGA, and PMGA, and larger peak velocity (PV)) for greater functional gains than TR. Furthermore, the beneficial effects would be maintained at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Findings of this study allow clinicians to understand the underlying motor control changes for functional improvement after home-based CIT.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: