Viewing Study NCT06277557


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:43 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-29 @ 12:02 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06277557
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-02-26
First Post: 2024-01-14
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Evaluation of the Effects of Virtual Reality Learning Environment on Nursing Student Non-technical Skills Development
Sponsor: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Evaluation of the Effects of Virtual Reality Learning Environment on Nursing Student Non-technical Skills Development: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this waitlist control study is to evaluate the benefits of virtual reality teaching pedagogy to developing non-technical skills in nursing students.

The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

1. What is the relationship between VR training programs and students' situation awareness skills development?
2. What is the relationship between VR training programs and students' communication skills development?
3. What is the relationship between VR training programs and students' satisfaction/self-confidence in learning?
4. What is the relationship between the sense of presence and satisfaction/ self-confidence in learning?
5. How does the student's learning experience after VR training programs?

Participants will attend the Virtual Reality training program. Researchers will compare the use of high-fidelity simulation to see if the non-technical skills were developed.
Detailed Description: The study employed a quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest, non-equivalent waitlist control group design. First, the quantitative methods were applied to obtain numerical evidence regarding statistical trends across the experimental and waitlisted control groups.

A pretest-posttest non-equivalent waitlist control group design was employed.

Convenience sampling was adopted to recruit subjects. Participants were recruited from the students who had enrolled in the subject "Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making." They were assigned into two study groups according to the tutorial teaching schedule: the control and the experimental groups. The Control group attended the usual teaching activities: simulation followed by the intervention (VR), whereas the intervention group participated in the VR (intervention) session followed by the simulation session (control).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: