Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 5:27 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05312385
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-03
First Post:
2022-03-11
Brief Title:
Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients INSPiRE-ICU1
Sponsor:
Sedana Medical
Organization:
Sedana Medical
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Controlled Open Label Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients INSPiRE-ICU1
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
INSPiRE-ICU1
Brief Summary:
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit ICU setting
Detailed Description:
This is a phase 3 multicenter randomized controlled open-label assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared to intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit ICU adult patients
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None