Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 5:27 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05311917
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-04-25
First Post:
2022-03-27
Brief Title:
Home Vision Therapy and Prism Prescription in Presbyopic Persons With Convergence Insufficiency
Sponsor:
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Organization:
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Study Overview
Official Title:
To Compare Home Vision Therapy and Prism Prescription in Presbyopic Persons With Convergence Insufficiency
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
convergence insufficiency is one of the most common binocular vision problems in which the eyes tend to have more exophoria in near than distance activities Its prevalence is typically reported from 225 to 296 depending on the study population and its definition Most of its symptoms include difficulty seeing at close works headache eye pain during study blurred vision diplopia movement of words in reading a feeling of pressure in the eye and lack of concentration Its signs include increasing near point of convergence more exophoria at near than distance decreased AC A ratio decreased positive fusional vergence
In patients with convergent insufficiency the first valid and standard questionnaire to assess the frequency and type of symptoms used before and after convergence insufficiency treatment is the convergence insufficiency symptom survey CISS questionnaire
Generally vision therapy is the first choice for convergence insufficiency management and the other choice is base in prism prescription On the other hand due to the changes in the interaction of the accommodation and convergence systems with increasing age It is necessary to study how these systems interact and compare their responses to the active treatment of vision therapy and inactive prescription of base in prism
In this controlled study investigators will evaluate and compare the effect of vision therapy and base in prism prescription in patients over 40 years of age this investigation will help to clarify which treatment is more effective
This study will have two phases In the first phase investigators will seek to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of CISS questionnaire for the elderly patients For this purpose investigators will use the Persian version questionnaire in previous study that assessed for young adults and the investigators will modify it and check the reliability and validity of the final Persian version for subjects with presbyopia This modified CISS questionnaire will be investigated in the elderly participants and the appropriate cut off point to differentiate between the normal group and the group with convergence insufficiency will be determined
in the second phase one optometrist ZKR will do the preliminary examination and another optometrist SA will do the interventions After the initial examination and having the inclusion criteria patients will be invited to participate in the study the nature of the research will be explained to subjects and informed consent will be obtained from them Before randomization patients are asked to complete the CISS questionnaire and submit this questionnaire to Optometrist No 1 ZKRAccording to the randomization all patients will be assigned to one of the treatment or control groups by optometrist No 1 Vision therapy exercises necessary trainings and prescriptions are given to all patients by Optometrist No 2 SAFor the participants in the control group only near glasses will be prescribed as a conventional treatment for the second group near glasses with base in prism according to sheards criterion will be prescribed and in the third group the prescription of near glasses will be given along with the complete training of the home exercises
In patients with convergent insufficiency the first valid and standard questionnaire to assess the frequency and type of symptoms used before and after convergence insufficiency treatment is the convergence insufficiency symptom survey CISS questionnaire
Generally vision therapy is the first choice for convergence insufficiency management and the other choice is base in prism prescription On the other hand due to the changes in the interaction of the accommodation and convergence systems with increasing age It is necessary to study how these systems interact and compare their responses to the active treatment of vision therapy and inactive prescription of base in prism
In this controlled study investigators will evaluate and compare the effect of vision therapy and base in prism prescription in patients over 40 years of age this investigation will help to clarify which treatment is more effective
This study will have two phases In the first phase investigators will seek to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of CISS questionnaire for the elderly patients For this purpose investigators will use the Persian version questionnaire in previous study that assessed for young adults and the investigators will modify it and check the reliability and validity of the final Persian version for subjects with presbyopia This modified CISS questionnaire will be investigated in the elderly participants and the appropriate cut off point to differentiate between the normal group and the group with convergence insufficiency will be determined
in the second phase one optometrist ZKR will do the preliminary examination and another optometrist SA will do the interventions After the initial examination and having the inclusion criteria patients will be invited to participate in the study the nature of the research will be explained to subjects and informed consent will be obtained from them Before randomization patients are asked to complete the CISS questionnaire and submit this questionnaire to Optometrist No 1 ZKRAccording to the randomization all patients will be assigned to one of the treatment or control groups by optometrist No 1 Vision therapy exercises necessary trainings and prescriptions are given to all patients by Optometrist No 2 SAFor the participants in the control group only near glasses will be prescribed as a conventional treatment for the second group near glasses with base in prism according to sheards criterion will be prescribed and in the third group the prescription of near glasses will be given along with the complete training of the home exercises
Detailed Description:
Between non-strabismic binocular vision problems convergence insufficiency is the most common problem 6 even in people with presbyopia this problem has high prevalence 11 The most common ocular finding in these patients is an increase in near exophoria and thus reduces persons performance in activities such as reading computer working and near activities 12 Despite the effectiveness of vision therapy in reducing patients symptoms and improving visual function the different accommodation and vergence systems in the elderly may cause different results 1 so a comprehensive study of adult patients over the age of 40 with convergence insufficiency is needed According to our knowledge the only study in these patients was done by MH Birnbaum 13 in 1999 which had several limitations For example in their study the results were classified and recorded as success and failure in functional therapy and improvement or non-improvement of asthenopia Success in treatment was achieved when two criteria were met 1 The criterion of asthenopia includes achieving the ability to study for at least one hour without diplopia And the ability to study without headache eye pain and loss of concentration at least 75 of the time 2- Achieving 3 options of functional criteria including having an appropriate near point of convergence having appropriate near point of convergence with red lens having low near phoria and positive fusional vergence
Another problem of this study was not using the CISS questionnaire which is a valid questionnaire of convergence insufficiency and only considered success in treatment based on the two criteria it should be mentioned that in their study the method for patients selection did not report On the other hand the study was not blind the importance of designing blind studies has been proven Only one study by B Teitelbaum assessed prism prescription in patients over 40 years with convergence insufficiency 14 their study had two main problems first selected patients did not necessarily have convergence insufficiency because the two basic criteria for convergence insufficiency near point of convergence and positive fusion vergence did not include in their study Second not using commercial progressive add lenses in patients glasses and it was unique lens with special design with limitation in base in prism prescription
Because of the effects of various factors on vision therapy including patients motivation lack of cooperation in eye exercise inappropriate age and unfavorable economic conditions especially in developing countries like Iran or pandemic condition like COVID19 pandemy vision therapy may not always be possible 1-3 and clinicians may have to prescribe base in prism for these patients On the other hand due to the changes in accommodation and convergence system and their interaction with aging 1 3-4 study of their responses to the two types of treatments including active vision therapy and passive base in prism therapy and comparing them are noticeable matter and solving this challenge is absolutely necessary
This study includes two phases In the first phase investigators will evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of questionnaire for the elderly patients this version was validated for young patients 38 Investigators will modify this questioner for presbyopic patients For this purpose six optometrists experienced in binocular vision will assess the questioner in two aspects validity and reliability
The validity of the modified Persian CISS include face validity use of meaningful words content validity relevancy clarity comprehensiveness discriminant validity Using a 6-point Likert scale very weak weak moderate good very good best face validity will be assessed according to the aspects of fluency in elderly patients cultural acceptance in iran and a score of 4 for each question will be passable Content validity will be determined based on 1-relevancy the extent to which the question of interest can being closely connected or appropriate for characteristics of the content under study 2-clarity appropriateness of the selected items in terms of being coherent and intelligible in concept and writing style and 3-comprehensiveness the ability of the questioner to cover all domains related to the topic under study Relevancy and clarity will be assessed item by item and for the whole items in the questioners using a 4-point Likert scale 1-undesirable 2-relatively desirable 3-desirable 4-completely desirable and the Item Content Validity Index I-CVI and Scale Content Validity Index S-CVI will be calculated for the indices Universal agreement approach will be used to check the I-CVI value and it will be between 0-100 and I-CVI 08 will be considered passable 20 The S-CVI for relevancy and clarity will be determined by averaging all I-CVI values Comprehensiveness will be only measured at the scale level using a 4-point Likert scale 1- incomprehensive 2- relatively comprehensive 3- comprehensive and 4- totally comprehensive Then the reliability of the questionnaire will be assessed using test-retest reliability analysis between first and second questioner administration in a group of 50 presbyopic patients aged 40-60 with convergence insufficiency The elderly participants will be asked to participate in a second administration of the questionnaire 7-14 days later To assess discriminant validity convergence insufficiency will be categorized to 3 groups of mild PFV 150 near exophoria severe PFV near exophoria and moderate values in between these groups based on the severity of clinical manifestations according to the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial guideline and the mean overall CISS score Will be compared between these three groups
Also to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CISS questionnaire in the elderly patients and to determine the appropriate cut off point to differentiate between the normal group and the group with the problem of convergence insufficiency a group of 50 people aged 40-60 with normal binocular vision to compare the scores will be considered to fill out the questionnaire and participants will complete the questionnaire again within 7 to 14 days
T-test will be used to compare the scores of the convergence insufficiency group and the group with normal binocular vision The area under the ROC curve will also be used to assess the ability of CISS scores to differentiate between individuals with convergence insufficiency and individuals with normal binocular vision Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC will be used to assess the reliability of the CISS questionnaire
In the second phase After the initial examination and having the inclusion criteria patients will be invited to participate in the study all the steps and nature of the research will be explained to them and informed consent will be obtained from them We will have two optometrists all patients will be assigned to one of the treatment or control groups by optometrist number 1 Zahra Kamary Rad Before randomization patients will be asked to complete the CISS questionnaire and submit this questionnaire to Optometrist No1 Optometric examinations will be done by optometrist No1 Zahra Kamary Rad First distance and near uncorrected visual acuity will be measured then patients refraction will be measured by autokeratorefractometer TOPCON KR8800 Japan and refraction will be repeated by retinoscopebeta 200 Heine Germany Subjective refraction with positive maximal lens method with maximum visual acuity will be obtained distance heterophoria will be measured at six meters with covzer and prism bar and target two lines above the best visual acuity The best visual acuity will be measured with near glasses at a distance of 40 cm and the cover test results are repeated three times and bracketing method will be used to determine the final result of the heterophoria measurements The near point of convergence will be evaluated by red-green filters method In this method the near point of convergence will be measured three times and the results will be averaged The near point of convergence is recorded based on break and recovery point with near glasses The amplitude of monocular accommodation will be calculated by push-up method first in the right eye and then in the left eye
Near step PFV will be measured by base out prism bar using 2030 column at 40 cm with patients near glasses Near vergence facility will be evaluated by flipper prism 3 base in and 12 base out with target two lines above the best near-corrected visual acuity This test will be also recorded by the patients near glasses
Stereopsis will be evaluated by the patients near glasses and red-green filters using TNO test To check the prism adaptation one hour after wearing the glasses the amount of heterophoria will be measured again and the amount of change in the heterophoria is recorded as prism adaptation in percentag Tropicamide 1 will be then dropped twice 5 minutes apart in both eyes and twenty minutes after the second drop refraction will be repeated An ophthalmologist will check and confirm the health status of the eyes with a slit lamp and a 90 lens After examining the patients by optometrist No 1 vision therapy exercises and necessary trainings will be given to all patients by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi In order to assign patients to each of the randomized treatment groups based on blocks classified according to age gender and severity of convergence insufficiency
For patients in control group new near glasses as a conventional treatment with the practice of random and aimless eye movements without convergence and accommodation effects will be prescribed by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi in Patients with base in prism prescription using sheards criterion near prismatic glasses will be prescribed and the amount of prism will be divided between two eyes and random and aimless eye movements without convergence and accommodation effects will be prescribed by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi
In patients in the home exercise group near glasses will be prescribed along with a complete training of the exercises and with a form of information about how and how long to do the exercise along with random and aimless eye movements by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi
These accommodation convergence training includes
Voluntary convergence Bug on string Eccentric Circles Jumping vergence Barrel card chiastopic fusion Brock string push-up These exercises will be performed by the patient in a variety of ways in each session Which will be 3 days a week for 20 minutes 10 minutes at noon and 10 minutes at night and must record these exercises for 2 month Home exercises include eight vision therapy exercises and patients willdo two exercises each day at noon and two exercises at night Also each exercise will be done five minutes so subjects have to do four different exercises every day and in the next session participants have to do the next four exercises
Participants should register these trainings in a special form for 2 months The total number of training sessions will be two months 24 sessions All prescribed glasses will be checked and used after confirmation and patients do not know in which group categorized
Practice and use of glasses will continue for 2 months and the participants will refer for the final examination and all optometric examinations will be repeated by optometrist No 1 It should also be noted that base in prism will be prescribed according to the sheards criterion and will be rounded upwards and this amount of prism is evenly divided between the two eye
Another problem of this study was not using the CISS questionnaire which is a valid questionnaire of convergence insufficiency and only considered success in treatment based on the two criteria it should be mentioned that in their study the method for patients selection did not report On the other hand the study was not blind the importance of designing blind studies has been proven Only one study by B Teitelbaum assessed prism prescription in patients over 40 years with convergence insufficiency 14 their study had two main problems first selected patients did not necessarily have convergence insufficiency because the two basic criteria for convergence insufficiency near point of convergence and positive fusion vergence did not include in their study Second not using commercial progressive add lenses in patients glasses and it was unique lens with special design with limitation in base in prism prescription
Because of the effects of various factors on vision therapy including patients motivation lack of cooperation in eye exercise inappropriate age and unfavorable economic conditions especially in developing countries like Iran or pandemic condition like COVID19 pandemy vision therapy may not always be possible 1-3 and clinicians may have to prescribe base in prism for these patients On the other hand due to the changes in accommodation and convergence system and their interaction with aging 1 3-4 study of their responses to the two types of treatments including active vision therapy and passive base in prism therapy and comparing them are noticeable matter and solving this challenge is absolutely necessary
This study includes two phases In the first phase investigators will evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of questionnaire for the elderly patients this version was validated for young patients 38 Investigators will modify this questioner for presbyopic patients For this purpose six optometrists experienced in binocular vision will assess the questioner in two aspects validity and reliability
The validity of the modified Persian CISS include face validity use of meaningful words content validity relevancy clarity comprehensiveness discriminant validity Using a 6-point Likert scale very weak weak moderate good very good best face validity will be assessed according to the aspects of fluency in elderly patients cultural acceptance in iran and a score of 4 for each question will be passable Content validity will be determined based on 1-relevancy the extent to which the question of interest can being closely connected or appropriate for characteristics of the content under study 2-clarity appropriateness of the selected items in terms of being coherent and intelligible in concept and writing style and 3-comprehensiveness the ability of the questioner to cover all domains related to the topic under study Relevancy and clarity will be assessed item by item and for the whole items in the questioners using a 4-point Likert scale 1-undesirable 2-relatively desirable 3-desirable 4-completely desirable and the Item Content Validity Index I-CVI and Scale Content Validity Index S-CVI will be calculated for the indices Universal agreement approach will be used to check the I-CVI value and it will be between 0-100 and I-CVI 08 will be considered passable 20 The S-CVI for relevancy and clarity will be determined by averaging all I-CVI values Comprehensiveness will be only measured at the scale level using a 4-point Likert scale 1- incomprehensive 2- relatively comprehensive 3- comprehensive and 4- totally comprehensive Then the reliability of the questionnaire will be assessed using test-retest reliability analysis between first and second questioner administration in a group of 50 presbyopic patients aged 40-60 with convergence insufficiency The elderly participants will be asked to participate in a second administration of the questionnaire 7-14 days later To assess discriminant validity convergence insufficiency will be categorized to 3 groups of mild PFV 150 near exophoria severe PFV near exophoria and moderate values in between these groups based on the severity of clinical manifestations according to the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial guideline and the mean overall CISS score Will be compared between these three groups
Also to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CISS questionnaire in the elderly patients and to determine the appropriate cut off point to differentiate between the normal group and the group with the problem of convergence insufficiency a group of 50 people aged 40-60 with normal binocular vision to compare the scores will be considered to fill out the questionnaire and participants will complete the questionnaire again within 7 to 14 days
T-test will be used to compare the scores of the convergence insufficiency group and the group with normal binocular vision The area under the ROC curve will also be used to assess the ability of CISS scores to differentiate between individuals with convergence insufficiency and individuals with normal binocular vision Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC will be used to assess the reliability of the CISS questionnaire
In the second phase After the initial examination and having the inclusion criteria patients will be invited to participate in the study all the steps and nature of the research will be explained to them and informed consent will be obtained from them We will have two optometrists all patients will be assigned to one of the treatment or control groups by optometrist number 1 Zahra Kamary Rad Before randomization patients will be asked to complete the CISS questionnaire and submit this questionnaire to Optometrist No1 Optometric examinations will be done by optometrist No1 Zahra Kamary Rad First distance and near uncorrected visual acuity will be measured then patients refraction will be measured by autokeratorefractometer TOPCON KR8800 Japan and refraction will be repeated by retinoscopebeta 200 Heine Germany Subjective refraction with positive maximal lens method with maximum visual acuity will be obtained distance heterophoria will be measured at six meters with covzer and prism bar and target two lines above the best visual acuity The best visual acuity will be measured with near glasses at a distance of 40 cm and the cover test results are repeated three times and bracketing method will be used to determine the final result of the heterophoria measurements The near point of convergence will be evaluated by red-green filters method In this method the near point of convergence will be measured three times and the results will be averaged The near point of convergence is recorded based on break and recovery point with near glasses The amplitude of monocular accommodation will be calculated by push-up method first in the right eye and then in the left eye
Near step PFV will be measured by base out prism bar using 2030 column at 40 cm with patients near glasses Near vergence facility will be evaluated by flipper prism 3 base in and 12 base out with target two lines above the best near-corrected visual acuity This test will be also recorded by the patients near glasses
Stereopsis will be evaluated by the patients near glasses and red-green filters using TNO test To check the prism adaptation one hour after wearing the glasses the amount of heterophoria will be measured again and the amount of change in the heterophoria is recorded as prism adaptation in percentag Tropicamide 1 will be then dropped twice 5 minutes apart in both eyes and twenty minutes after the second drop refraction will be repeated An ophthalmologist will check and confirm the health status of the eyes with a slit lamp and a 90 lens After examining the patients by optometrist No 1 vision therapy exercises and necessary trainings will be given to all patients by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi In order to assign patients to each of the randomized treatment groups based on blocks classified according to age gender and severity of convergence insufficiency
For patients in control group new near glasses as a conventional treatment with the practice of random and aimless eye movements without convergence and accommodation effects will be prescribed by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi in Patients with base in prism prescription using sheards criterion near prismatic glasses will be prescribed and the amount of prism will be divided between two eyes and random and aimless eye movements without convergence and accommodation effects will be prescribed by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi
In patients in the home exercise group near glasses will be prescribed along with a complete training of the exercises and with a form of information about how and how long to do the exercise along with random and aimless eye movements by optometrist No 2 Saeid Abdi
These accommodation convergence training includes
Voluntary convergence Bug on string Eccentric Circles Jumping vergence Barrel card chiastopic fusion Brock string push-up These exercises will be performed by the patient in a variety of ways in each session Which will be 3 days a week for 20 minutes 10 minutes at noon and 10 minutes at night and must record these exercises for 2 month Home exercises include eight vision therapy exercises and patients willdo two exercises each day at noon and two exercises at night Also each exercise will be done five minutes so subjects have to do four different exercises every day and in the next session participants have to do the next four exercises
Participants should register these trainings in a special form for 2 months The total number of training sessions will be two months 24 sessions All prescribed glasses will be checked and used after confirmation and patients do not know in which group categorized
Practice and use of glasses will continue for 2 months and the participants will refer for the final examination and all optometric examinations will be repeated by optometrist No 1 It should also be noted that base in prism will be prescribed according to the sheards criterion and will be rounded upwards and this amount of prism is evenly divided between the two eye
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None