Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 5:30 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:32 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00466648
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2007-04-27
First Post:
2007-04-25
Brief Title:
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
Sponsor:
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Organization:
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Methods of Laparoscopy Port Closure
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2007-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study wishes to compare patient satisfaction and cosmesis of two different closure methods of laparoscopic ports One method uses tissue adhesive Dermabond with a deep sub-cutaneous stitch and a Band-Aid dressing The comparison method uses a 3o undyed vicryl transcutaneous stitch with a Bacitracin and Tegaderm dressing
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None