Viewing Study NCT00465049



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 5:29 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:32 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00465049
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2012-10-22
First Post: 2007-04-23

Brief Title: Comparison of Suturing and Packing of Drained Abscesses
Sponsor: Stony Brook University
Organization: Stony Brook University

Study Overview

Official Title: Primary vs Secondary Closure of Cutaneous Abscesses After ID A RCT
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2012-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The standard treatment for skin abscesses in drainage followed by packing to prevent premature closure and reaccumulation of pus Studies from the 1950s and later conducted outside of the US suggest that when drained abscesses are drained and sutured closed they actually heal faster without complications The current study compares the time to healing and scar formation when drained abscesses are packed or sutured
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None