Viewing Study NCT04698668


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:28 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-30 @ 7:55 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04698668
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-06-25
First Post: 2021-01-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Evaluation of the Outcomes and Performances of the Application of Augmented Reality in Operative Digestive Endoscopy
Sponsor: Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Fusion Radiology in Interventional Endoscopy (FRIEnd) Approach for Pancreatic Fluid Collections
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2021-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Virtual reality obtained by the fusion of images can be applied to several fields of medicine leading to the so called "augmented reality". Since 2017 investigators have been using a new digital angiographic system (Discovery IGS 40, General Electrics), where fluoroscopy can be fused with pre-procedural CT o MRI. Specifically the present study aimed at verifying the advantages that fusion imaging could bring in EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatitis fluid collection (PFC), i.e. pseudocysts or WON, in terms of more appropriate visualization, drainage approach and time needed for resolution.
Detailed Description: 17 drainages performed with traditional radiology (group 1) were retrospectively compared with 14 ones achieved with the fusion approach (group 2). The two population were homogenous for age, sex, pancreatitis etiology and indication for drainage whereas PFCs of group 2 were larger (663 cm3 vs 437 cm3), more frequently WON than pseudocysts and were treated more precociously. As for procedure, in the group 2, thanks to fusion imaging, endoscopists didn't need ever contrast media - that was pivotal with traditional radiology - to adequately define lesion morphology. LAMS (Axios) stents were placed mainly in group 2, while in group 1 other types of stent were used.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: