Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 4:26 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 2:10 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04988503
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-01-18
First Post:
2021-07-23
Brief Title:
Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils
Sponsor:
Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils for the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms a Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between bare platinum coil group and second-generation hydrogel coils for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
Detailed Description:
The investigators aimed to analyze whether the use of second-generation hydrogel coils for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms improves clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with the use of bare platinum coils
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None