Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:57 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 6:46 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04671368
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-12-17
First Post:
2020-12-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Diagnostic Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Neuropathology
Sponsor:
Jinsong Wu
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Multi-center, Prospective, Self-Controlled Diagnostic Accuracy Comparative Studies of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System for Surgical Neuropathology
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-12
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a multi-center, prospective, self-controlled, diagnostic accuracy comparative study of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System for Surgical Neuropathology. The investigators will compare the diagnostic efficiency of Artificial Intelligence with that of practicing pathologists, and suppose that the diagnostic efficiency of artificial intelligence in prospective clinical data is no less than that of pathologists.
Detailed Description:
In this study, 141 patients will be recruited. After being enrolled, the patients will accept surgery and specimens for pathological analysis will be taken according to the routine treatment process.
The histopathologic slides will then be digitized by a whole-slide scanner. The images will be reviewed by gold standard committee for evaluation of ground truth. And then be separately diagnosed by Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System and practicing pathologists. So the investigators can compare the diagnostic efficiency of Artificial Intelligence with that of pathologists, thus understand the gap between artificial intelligence and actual clinical practice.
The histopathologic slides will then be digitized by a whole-slide scanner. The images will be reviewed by gold standard committee for evaluation of ground truth. And then be separately diagnosed by Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System and practicing pathologists. So the investigators can compare the diagnostic efficiency of Artificial Intelligence with that of pathologists, thus understand the gap between artificial intelligence and actual clinical practice.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: