Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:57 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-21 @ 6:24 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02002468
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2016-09-15
First Post:
2013-11-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Follow-up of Abnormal and Inadequate Smear-test Results
Sponsor:
University of Aarhus
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Follow-up of Abnormal and Inadequate Test Results in the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2015-12
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Denmark has a higher incidence of cervical cancer than other Nordic countries, although all Danish women (aged 23-65) are screened regularly to identify possible cervical dysplasia or asymptomatic invasive cancer.
Annually 40 000 women receives an abnormal or inadequate test result and a follow-up recommendation.
However problems with delayed follow-up may threaten the effectiveness of the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program, as 20% of women are delayed and dysplasia potentially can progress into cancer.
Delayed follow-up is found in situations where women either consciously or unconsciously postpone follow-up, or because of organizational aspects of the screening program, where communication regarding test results can fail either in content or with delay.This study will evaluate two interventions designed to increase follow-up:
1. A letter with the test result and potential recommendation for follow up will be sent to the women (RCT). The intention is to ensure that all women will be notified about the test result, quickly, homogenously and in layman's written language, still with the opportunity to contact or be contacted by the general practitioner, if there is special needs. Furthermore, it is assumed that general practitioner consultations regarding delivery of normal test results will decrease, so that cost savings is a potential side benefit
2. Electronic reminder to the general practitioner if women have not had the recommended follow up, giving the general practioner´s an opportunity to remind the women (retro perspective cohort study).
The results will be of great importance to the future organisation of cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes in Denmark, but will also have international interest because of their similar challenges.
Annually 40 000 women receives an abnormal or inadequate test result and a follow-up recommendation.
However problems with delayed follow-up may threaten the effectiveness of the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program, as 20% of women are delayed and dysplasia potentially can progress into cancer.
Delayed follow-up is found in situations where women either consciously or unconsciously postpone follow-up, or because of organizational aspects of the screening program, where communication regarding test results can fail either in content or with delay.This study will evaluate two interventions designed to increase follow-up:
1. A letter with the test result and potential recommendation for follow up will be sent to the women (RCT). The intention is to ensure that all women will be notified about the test result, quickly, homogenously and in layman's written language, still with the opportunity to contact or be contacted by the general practitioner, if there is special needs. Furthermore, it is assumed that general practitioner consultations regarding delivery of normal test results will decrease, so that cost savings is a potential side benefit
2. Electronic reminder to the general practitioner if women have not had the recommended follow up, giving the general practioner´s an opportunity to remind the women (retro perspective cohort study).
The results will be of great importance to the future organisation of cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes in Denmark, but will also have international interest because of their similar challenges.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: