Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 5:23 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:31 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00444756
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2007-03-08
First Post:
2007-03-07
Brief Title:
Jet Injection of 1 Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Intravenous IV Catheterization in Children
Sponsor:
Norton Healthcare
Organization:
Norton Healthcare
Study Overview
Official Title:
Jet Injection of 1 Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Children
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2007-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This trial is a comparison of the anesthetic effectiveness of J-Tip needle-free jet injection of 1 buffered lidocaine to the anesthetic effectiveness of topical 4 ELA-Max for peripheral intravenous catheter PIV insertion The researchers hypothesize that the jet injection of lidocaine will provide superior anesthesia to the ELA-Max prior to PIV insertion
Detailed Description:
A prospective block-randomized controlled trial comparing J-Tip jet injection of 1 buffered lidocaine to a 30-minute application of 4 ELA-Max for topical anesthesia in children 8-15 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric emergency department for PIV insertion All subjects recorded self-reported Visual Analogue Scale VAS scores for pain at time of enrollment and pain of PIV insertion Jet injection subjects also recorded pain of jet injection Subjects were videotaped during jet injection and PIV insertion Videotapes were reviewed by a single blinded reviewer for observer-reported VAS pain scores for jet injection and PIV insertion
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None