Viewing Study NCT04871022



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 4:07 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 2:03 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04871022
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-09-27
First Post: 2021-04-28

Brief Title: Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
Sponsor: University Tunis El Manar
Organization: University Tunis El Manar

Study Overview

Official Title: Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: There are different surgical techniques of uterine closure during cesarean Currently data suggest that the double layer unlocked closure technique is associated with better uterine scar healing and this technique is considered the gold standard

This study compares two techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness

1 Double layer unlocked suture
2 Purse suture of the uterus with a first continuous purse suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture including the remaining part of the myometrium

The primary outcome is the mean residual myometrium thickness at the site of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound at six months after cesarean
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None