Viewing Study NCT04835415



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 4:00 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 2:01 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04835415
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-01-27
First Post: 2021-04-04

Brief Title: Ultrasound Guided Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Sponsor: Zagazig University
Organization: Zagazig University

Study Overview

Official Title: Ultrasound Guided Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of this study is to evaluate analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block vs ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia in pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Detailed Description: To study the difference between the effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral retrolaminar block and ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia on pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy To relief pain and improve satisfaction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Zagazig university hospitals

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None