Viewing Study NCT04828369



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 3:59 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 2:01 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04828369
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-09-02
First Post: 2021-03-25

Brief Title: Efficacy and Safety of EUS-Guided Therapy Versus BRTO for Gastric Varices With Shunt
Sponsor: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Organization: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Study Overview

Official Title: Efficacy and Safety of EUS-Guided Coil Embolization Combined With Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection Versus Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices With High-risk Ectopic Embolism
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study is a retrospective multi-center and observational clinical study Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University The fifth medical center of PLA General Hospital Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital affiliated Nanjing University Medical School and Xiangyang Central Hospital will participate in the study Investigators would like to provide evidence-based medical evidence by evaluating and comparing the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration BRTO in the treatment of gastric varices GV with spontaneous portosystemic shunt SPSS

Between January 2014 and December 2020 patients with GV secondary to portal hypertension admitted to a tertiary medical center are enrolled consecutively according to the following criteria 1 age18 years 2endoscopic examination confirms the presence of GV 3 CTA of the portal system and EUS revealed the presence of SPSS the diameter was between 5 mm to 15 mm 4 treatment with EUS-guided coil combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or BRTO Exclusion criteria are as follows 1malignant tumors 2 hepatic encephalopathy hepatorenal syndrome or multiple organ failure 3 previously received esophagus or stomach surgery 4 pregnant

Investigators will collect patients data of baseline character treatment postoperative and follow-up All patients will be followed up until the progress of the disease or the end of the study And rebleeding ectopic embolism survival and sequential treatment will be recorded during the follow-up period

The primary endpoint are five-day rebleeding rate and six-week mortality rate The secondary endpoint are technical success rate incidence of ectopic embolism eradication of GV one-year rebleeding rate one-year mortality rate and cost-effectiveness ratio All data and information use SPSS statistical software to complete all statistical analysis
Detailed Description: Because the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and BRTO in the treatment of GV with SPSS have different conclusions in different studies Investigators based on that the five-day rebleeding rate of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection is 7 BRTO is 10 The number of people in the two groups are equal significant level α is 005 and the test power is 08 Each group requires 35 patients Because of the 10 loss to follow-up the sample capacity is 39

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None