Viewing Study NCT05057468


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:46 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-29 @ 3:49 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05057468
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-03-20
First Post: 2021-09-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Second-line Treatment of Primary Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Sponsor: Assiut University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Cyclosporine As a Second-line Treatment of Primary Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: the cyclosporine showed efficacy in many immune cytopenic diseases in the light of numerous case reports and retrospective data. This study compares cyclosporin versus rituximab in steroid-refractory anemia.
Detailed Description: Auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a heterogeneous syndrome in adults. This disease is associated with significant morbidity-mortality. First-line treatment with prolonged corticosteroid is well identified but there is not enough data about cyclosporine treatment in case of resistance or dependence on steroids.

the cyclosporine showed efficacy in many immune cytopenic diseases in the light of numerous case reports and retrospective data. This drug is cheap, licensed in immunologic diseases, and does not expose to major infections. So, we compare cyclosporin versus rituximab in steroid-refractory anemia.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: