Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:45 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:56 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04743648
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-04-05
First Post:
2021-02-03
Brief Title:
Effect of Innovative Thinking Development Program on Some Approaches of Nursing Students
Sponsor:
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Organization:
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of The Innovatıve Thınkıng Development Program on The Innovatıve Approaches Crıtıcal Thınkıng and Perceıved Competence of Nursıng Students
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background This study was conducted to determine the effect of the Innovative Thinking Development Program ITDP on the innovative approaches critical thinking and perceived competence of nursing studentsThe study has a non-randomized control group pre-test-post-test experimental research design The study population consisted of senior students in the Nursing Department of two similar faculties in the academic calendar 2019-2020 n164 In the study the ITDB developed by the researcher was applied to the students in the experimental group The research data were collected online using a Personal Information Form Individual Innovativeness Scale Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale Self-Efficacy Scale and Success Test developed by the researcher Independent samples t test Kruskal Wallis Wilcoxon ANOVA tests were used in the analysis of the data Institutional permissions and ethics committee approval was obtained for the research
Hypothesis
H0 The innovative approaches critical thinking tendencies and competence perceptions of nursing students included in ITDP do not change
H1 Individual innovativeness critical thinking disposition and self-efficacy scale scores of nursing students in the experimental group will change after ITDP
Hypothesis
H0 The innovative approaches critical thinking tendencies and competence perceptions of nursing students included in ITDP do not change
H1 Individual innovativeness critical thinking disposition and self-efficacy scale scores of nursing students in the experimental group will change after ITDP
Detailed Description:
This study was conducted to determine the effect of the ITDP on the innovative approaches critical thinking and perceived competence of nursing studentsThe non randomized clinical trial was based on the guidelines proposed by the Consolidated standard of Reporting Trials- CONSORT 2010 The data of the research were collected in Giresun and Ordu University Health Science Faculty between April 2020- October 2020
In this study there is a non-randomized experimental group and two control groups total 164 nursing students Experimental and control groups were determined by lots Data collected through online forms
The developed educational program was implemented to students in the experimental group through an online platform The trainings lasted 6 weeks and different applications were made with themes appropriate to the content In addition a whatsapp group was opened and posts about innovation thinking exercises were made
The research data were collected a Personal Information Form Individual Innovativeness Scale Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale and Self-Efficacy Scale in pre test and post testsThe efficiency of the program was determined by applying an Success Test to the experimental group
Personal Information Form The twenty-one question Personal Information Form consists of sociodemographic questions and questions related to innovation
Individual Innovation Scale IIS The scale was developed in 1977 The scale was adapted to Turkish in 2014 The scale adapted to nursing is 5-point Likert type It consists of three sub-dimensions and a total of 18 questions These sub dimensions are resistance to change sub-dimension opinion leadership sub-dimension and risk-taking sub-dimension According to the score obtained from the scale Scores of 57 and below are classified as traditionalist those who score between 58-65 as skeptical those who score between 66 and 74 as questioning those who score between 75 and 82 as pioneer and those who score 82 and above as innovative Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 082 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 094
Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale MCTTS The scale was developed in 2018 The scale consists of 28 items and 6 sub-dimensions The scale is in 5-point Likert type Scale sub-dimensions reasoning reaching judgment searching for evidence searching for truth open-mindedness and systematicity The high score obtained from each sub-dimension of the scale indicates that the individual has the feature in the relevant sub-dimension Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 091 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 093
Self-Efficacy Scale SESThe scale was developed in 1983The scale was adapted to Turkish in 1999 It is a 5-point Likert type consisting of 23 items The 4 sub-dimensions of the scale are starting behavior maintaining behavior completing behavior and struggling with obstacles The high total score obtained from the scale indicates that the general efficacy perception is high and the low general efficacy perception is low Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 081 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 088
Evaluation of Data SPSS 230 statistical package program was used for statistical analysis and evaluation of the data Whether the data showed normal distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Independent samples t test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare data between groups according to normality test Paired samples t test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the pre-test and post-test values within the group The Chi-square test and two ratio tests were used to analyze categorical data Significance level was taken as p 005
Information
No budget was received from any institution for the research Ethics committee approval was obtained and verbal consent was obtained from the participants
There is no conflict of interest
In this study there is a non-randomized experimental group and two control groups total 164 nursing students Experimental and control groups were determined by lots Data collected through online forms
The developed educational program was implemented to students in the experimental group through an online platform The trainings lasted 6 weeks and different applications were made with themes appropriate to the content In addition a whatsapp group was opened and posts about innovation thinking exercises were made
The research data were collected a Personal Information Form Individual Innovativeness Scale Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale and Self-Efficacy Scale in pre test and post testsThe efficiency of the program was determined by applying an Success Test to the experimental group
Personal Information Form The twenty-one question Personal Information Form consists of sociodemographic questions and questions related to innovation
Individual Innovation Scale IIS The scale was developed in 1977 The scale was adapted to Turkish in 2014 The scale adapted to nursing is 5-point Likert type It consists of three sub-dimensions and a total of 18 questions These sub dimensions are resistance to change sub-dimension opinion leadership sub-dimension and risk-taking sub-dimension According to the score obtained from the scale Scores of 57 and below are classified as traditionalist those who score between 58-65 as skeptical those who score between 66 and 74 as questioning those who score between 75 and 82 as pioneer and those who score 82 and above as innovative Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 082 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 094
Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale MCTTS The scale was developed in 2018 The scale consists of 28 items and 6 sub-dimensions The scale is in 5-point Likert type Scale sub-dimensions reasoning reaching judgment searching for evidence searching for truth open-mindedness and systematicity The high score obtained from each sub-dimension of the scale indicates that the individual has the feature in the relevant sub-dimension Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 091 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 093
Self-Efficacy Scale SESThe scale was developed in 1983The scale was adapted to Turkish in 1999 It is a 5-point Likert type consisting of 23 items The 4 sub-dimensions of the scale are starting behavior maintaining behavior completing behavior and struggling with obstacles The high total score obtained from the scale indicates that the general efficacy perception is high and the low general efficacy perception is low Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 081 The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 088
Evaluation of Data SPSS 230 statistical package program was used for statistical analysis and evaluation of the data Whether the data showed normal distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Independent samples t test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare data between groups according to normality test Paired samples t test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the pre-test and post-test values within the group The Chi-square test and two ratio tests were used to analyze categorical data Significance level was taken as p 005
Information
No budget was received from any institution for the research Ethics committee approval was obtained and verbal consent was obtained from the participants
There is no conflict of interest
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None