Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:45 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:56 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04743258
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-02-08
First Post:
2020-08-18
Brief Title:
Bilateral Premolar Extraction vs Distalization A Randomised Clinical Trial
Sponsor:
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Organization:
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of Treatment Changes in Class II Div 1 Malocclusion With Bilateral Extraction of Maxillary First Premolars vs Full Arch Distalization A Randomised Clinical Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-01
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Rationale Class II Division 1 malocclusion is characterized by upper anterior teeth protrusion resulting in upper lip protrusion and convex facial profile which are considered esthetically unfavorable Treatment of class II malocclusion due to maxillary protrusion can be done with bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction followed by en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth using mini implants placed between maxillary 2nd premolar 1st molar
Treatment of class II malocclusion due to maxillary protrusion without premolar extraction frequently requires distalization of maxillary molars into Class I molar relation by means of extra-oral or intraoral forces Absolute skeletal anchorage available 24 hours a day is an alternative method for molar distalization Zygomatic miniplates fixed at a distance from the root apices allows distalization of entire dentition as there is no interference between the fixation device and roots of the teeth
Aims and Objectives To evaluate dental skeletal soft tissue changes achieved with maxillary premolar extraction vs full arch distalization
Method of study Patients will be allocated randomly to 2 groups-G1 and G2 Patients in G1 will undergo bilateral maxillary 1st premolar extraction before bonding followed by leveling alignment Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 00190025 stainless steel wire Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Mini implants will be placed under local anaesthesia between maxillary 2nd premolar 1st molar Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply a force for en masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth
In G2 treatment will be initiated by bonding 0022 slot MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 00190025 stainless steel wire Zygomatic miniplates will be placed bilaterally Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply a force
Treatment of class II malocclusion due to maxillary protrusion without premolar extraction frequently requires distalization of maxillary molars into Class I molar relation by means of extra-oral or intraoral forces Absolute skeletal anchorage available 24 hours a day is an alternative method for molar distalization Zygomatic miniplates fixed at a distance from the root apices allows distalization of entire dentition as there is no interference between the fixation device and roots of the teeth
Aims and Objectives To evaluate dental skeletal soft tissue changes achieved with maxillary premolar extraction vs full arch distalization
Method of study Patients will be allocated randomly to 2 groups-G1 and G2 Patients in G1 will undergo bilateral maxillary 1st premolar extraction before bonding followed by leveling alignment Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 00190025 stainless steel wire Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Mini implants will be placed under local anaesthesia between maxillary 2nd premolar 1st molar Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply a force for en masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth
In G2 treatment will be initiated by bonding 0022 slot MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 00190025 stainless steel wire Zygomatic miniplates will be placed bilaterally Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply a force
Detailed Description:
The present study is a prospective non-pharmacological single blind randomized clinical study to evaluate the skeletal dental and soft tissue changes with distalization of entire maxillary dentition using bilateral maxillary 1st premolar extraction in comparison with zygomatic miniplates in class II division 1 patients The present study will be conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics in conjunction with the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery PGIDS Pt BDSharma University of Health Sciences Rohtak The study will be carried out after the institutional approval obtained from the ethical committee
SOURCE OF DATA The study sample consists of 34 subjects selected from the patients attending the regular OPD at the Department of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopaedics for orthodontic treatment
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Non growing patients
Complete bilateral Class II molar relationship at pre-treatment
All permanent teeth upto the second molars should be present
No or minor crowding in the maxillary arch
Horizontal to average growth pattern
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Subjects with a history of fixed orthodontic treatment
Crossbite
Vertical growth pattern
Any systemic disease affecting bone and general growth
Poor oral hygiene
Cleft patients
Patients who fail to follow up or undergo complete treatment TARGET SAMPLE SIZE
A sample size of 15 per group for the present study was calculated to detect a clinical difference of 39 mm with effect size 086 at 95 power and 5 significance level To compensate for 10 dropouts the final sample size was calculated to be 17 per group
INFORMED CONSENT OF THE PATIENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE RANDOMIZED A valid written informed consent of the patient or parent guardian and an agreement to be randomized will be obtained from the patient before registering the patient in this clinical study Patient will be informed about all the theoretical risks and benefits of the intervention under test Annexure I The patient will be given 72 hours to discuss the study with hisher family and take the decision regarding participation in the study
RANDOMIZATION ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT Randomization will be done by a person not involved in the trial using computer generated randomization list The study subjects will be blinded regarding intervention group
INTERVENTION AND DESIGN OF STUDY The main intervention in this prospective clinical study is the extraction of bilateral maxillary first premolars before initial leveling and alignment with retraction of anterior teeth using mini implants in first group G1 and is the placement of zygomatic miniplates after initial leveling and alignment of maxillary dental arch in second groupG2 The study consists of 2 groups with equal allocation of subjects in each group- Group 1 G1- In this group bilateral maxillary 1st premolars will be extracted followed by Levelling alignment with 0022 MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 0019 0025 stainless steel wire Placement of Mini implants bilaterally between maxillary 2nd premolar 1st molar under LA Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply force Regular follow up of the patient will be done and records including cephalograms and study models will be taken post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring Group 2 G2- In this group treatment will be initiated with 0022 MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 0019 0025 stainless steel wire After that bilateral Maxillary third molar will be extracted if present followed by placement of zygomatic miniplates bilaterally under LAHooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply force Regular follow up of the patient will be done and records including cephalograms and study models will be taken post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring DATA COLLECTION The investigator will record the patients name address and contact number and other relevant case history records Annexure II will be taken Cephalometric radiographs will be recorded before treatment and after 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring for assessment of hard and soft tissue changes The pretreatment and post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring the cephalometric radiographs will be analyzed The relevant values will be entered in a predesigned format Annexure III IV Soft tissue profile changes between pretreatment and post treatment will be assessed on lateral cephalogram and the raters- orthodontist laypersonspatientsparents and general dentists will assess changes in facial appearance on a visual analog scale with profile photographs and comparison will be done between the two groups Patient perception will be assessed using questionare rating by patient regarding various parameters at 1week 2 weeks 1 month and 6 months after the placement of zygomatic miniplate or extraction Quality of life will also be assessed using questionnaire rating by patient at pre-treatment mid-treatment and post treatment Occlusal status changes between pre and post treatment will be assessed using PAR indexpeer assessment rating between 2 groups
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data will be entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS 21Statistical Package For Social Sciences package for relevant statistical comparison Results will be presented in the form of tables and graphs
Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics will be used Data will be checked for normality In all the analysis the level of significance will be set a 5 percent
SOURCE OF DATA The study sample consists of 34 subjects selected from the patients attending the regular OPD at the Department of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopaedics for orthodontic treatment
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Non growing patients
Complete bilateral Class II molar relationship at pre-treatment
All permanent teeth upto the second molars should be present
No or minor crowding in the maxillary arch
Horizontal to average growth pattern
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Subjects with a history of fixed orthodontic treatment
Crossbite
Vertical growth pattern
Any systemic disease affecting bone and general growth
Poor oral hygiene
Cleft patients
Patients who fail to follow up or undergo complete treatment TARGET SAMPLE SIZE
A sample size of 15 per group for the present study was calculated to detect a clinical difference of 39 mm with effect size 086 at 95 power and 5 significance level To compensate for 10 dropouts the final sample size was calculated to be 17 per group
INFORMED CONSENT OF THE PATIENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE RANDOMIZED A valid written informed consent of the patient or parent guardian and an agreement to be randomized will be obtained from the patient before registering the patient in this clinical study Patient will be informed about all the theoretical risks and benefits of the intervention under test Annexure I The patient will be given 72 hours to discuss the study with hisher family and take the decision regarding participation in the study
RANDOMIZATION ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT Randomization will be done by a person not involved in the trial using computer generated randomization list The study subjects will be blinded regarding intervention group
INTERVENTION AND DESIGN OF STUDY The main intervention in this prospective clinical study is the extraction of bilateral maxillary first premolars before initial leveling and alignment with retraction of anterior teeth using mini implants in first group G1 and is the placement of zygomatic miniplates after initial leveling and alignment of maxillary dental arch in second groupG2 The study consists of 2 groups with equal allocation of subjects in each group- Group 1 G1- In this group bilateral maxillary 1st premolars will be extracted followed by Levelling alignment with 0022 MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 0019 0025 stainless steel wire Placement of Mini implants bilaterally between maxillary 2nd premolar 1st molar under LA Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply force Regular follow up of the patient will be done and records including cephalograms and study models will be taken post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring Group 2 G2- In this group treatment will be initiated with 0022 MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of 0019 0025 stainless steel wire After that bilateral Maxillary third molar will be extracted if present followed by placement of zygomatic miniplates bilaterally under LAHooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition Ni-Ti closed coil spring will be used to apply force Regular follow up of the patient will be done and records including cephalograms and study models will be taken post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring DATA COLLECTION The investigator will record the patients name address and contact number and other relevant case history records Annexure II will be taken Cephalometric radiographs will be recorded before treatment and after 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring for assessment of hard and soft tissue changes The pretreatment and post 6 months of application of NiTi closed coil spring the cephalometric radiographs will be analyzed The relevant values will be entered in a predesigned format Annexure III IV Soft tissue profile changes between pretreatment and post treatment will be assessed on lateral cephalogram and the raters- orthodontist laypersonspatientsparents and general dentists will assess changes in facial appearance on a visual analog scale with profile photographs and comparison will be done between the two groups Patient perception will be assessed using questionare rating by patient regarding various parameters at 1week 2 weeks 1 month and 6 months after the placement of zygomatic miniplate or extraction Quality of life will also be assessed using questionnaire rating by patient at pre-treatment mid-treatment and post treatment Occlusal status changes between pre and post treatment will be assessed using PAR indexpeer assessment rating between 2 groups
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data will be entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS 21Statistical Package For Social Sciences package for relevant statistical comparison Results will be presented in the form of tables and graphs
Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics will be used Data will be checked for normality In all the analysis the level of significance will be set a 5 percent
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None