Viewing Study NCT01027468


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:44 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 4:04 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01027468
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-04-24
First Post: 2009-12-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Long-term Results After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Treatment Of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Sponsor: Medical University of Vienna
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Functional, Morphological And Safety Results After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Treatment Of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration - 3 Years Of Follow-up
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: 200 eyes with each subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration will be included in this study and 3 years after the initial intravitreal bevacizumab, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) will be measured using Snellen charts at 6m. Central retinal thickness (CRT) will be measured using Stratus OCT and Cirrus SD-OCT (Zeiss). Data of treatment-naive eyes (group 1) were compared to the data of eyes that had undergone prior treatment with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (group 2).
Detailed Description: In this interventional clinical study, 181 eyes of 160 consecutive patients with active neovascular related macular degeneration meeting recommended criteria for inclusion and protocol criteria for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy undergoing intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy were evaluated. Data of treatment-naive eyes (Group 1, n = 114) were analyzed separately from eyes that had undergone previous photodynamic therapy plus intravitreal triamcinolone (Group 2, n = 67). Re-treatment criteria were based on clinical outcome following the official European label regimen. After 1 year of continuous service at an academic referral center, follow-up was performed in private practices in collaboration with the referral center. Main outcome parameters were best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: