Viewing Study NCT04690894



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 3:36 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 1:53 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04690894
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2021-03-08
First Post: 2020-12-28

Brief Title: Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Caudal Block by Sonar in Pediatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery
Sponsor: Minia University
Organization: Minia University

Study Overview

Official Title: Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Patient Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: this prospective randomized double blind controlled study was conducted on 60 child scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia the patients were randomly allocated into 3 parallel groupsgroup ESB patients received ultrasound-guided erector spinae block in a dose of 04mgml of 025bupivacaine between the 10th transverse process and erector spinae musclesgroupCB patients received ultrasound-guided caudal block in a dose of 25mgkg of 025bupivacaine groupCO didt received any block
Detailed Description: on arrival of the patients to the operative theatre and after placement of the standard monitoring general inhalational anesthesia was induced by face mask with sevoflurane 4-8 in oxygen after IV cannula was secured patients received 1mickg fentanyl and intubation was facilitated by 05mgkg atracurium isoflurane 1-2 with oxygen was used for maintenance of anesthesia after stabilization of the patients hemodynamics and before skin incision erector spinae block or caudal block was performed with the patient in lateral position after the block patients were flipped back to their normal supine position surgery took place 10 min after injection of local anesthetic after termination of surgery reversal of the atracurium was done by giving neostigmine in a dose of 004mgkg and atropine 002mgkg and awake extubation was done

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None