Viewing Study NCT07129668


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:39 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-02 @ 12:01 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT07129668
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-08-19
First Post: 2025-08-11
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effects of Finger Kazoo Exercise With and Without Oropharyngeal Enlargement in the Operatic Singing Voice
Sponsor: Aveiro University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Effects of Finger Kazoo Exercise With and Without Oropharyngeal Enlargement in the Operatic Singing Voice: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Controlled Clinical Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2025-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: FIKVOX
Brief Summary: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of the semi-occluded vocal tract exercise Finger Kazoo (FK), with and without oropharyngeal expansion, on the singing voice. Fifteen classically trained singers, screened using the Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10), participated in a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial with two experimental sessions separated by 48 hours. Participants were randomized via Sealed Envelope to start in Condition A (without oropharyngeal expansion) or Condition B (with oropharyngeal expansion). In each session, standardized recordings were obtained before and after the intervention, including maximum phonation time for the vowels /a/ and /i/, and an operatic aria excerpt. Acoustic analysis (PRAAT) extracted fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, and shimmer. Comparisons between baseline and experimental conditions were performed using paired-samples t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, robust paired t-tests, and Friedman ANOVA with Durbin-Conover, Tukey, Bonferroni, and Holm post hoc corrections, with a 95% confidence interval. Auditory-perceptual evaluation was conducted by 15 blinded experts using the EAI Scale Form, with balanced sample distribution among raters. Self-perceptual evaluation was also performed by participants using the same scale.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
doi.org/10.54499/2023.0361.BD OTHER_GRANT Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia View