Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:19 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:47 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04597333
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-04-20
First Post:
2020-10-15
Brief Title:
Labor Induction After Failed Induction With Dinoprostone
Sponsor:
Rambam Health Care Campus
Organization:
Rambam Health Care Campus
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Cervical Ripening Balloon Versus 2nd Dinoprostone Insert for Labor Induction in Women With a Failed 1st Attempt of Induction With Dinoprostone
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Women after induction of labor with a dinoprostone insert will be evaluated after 24 hours from the beginning of labor induction Women with a BISHOP score of less than 5 will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups Induction with a cervical ripening balloon versus induction with a 2nd dinoprostone insert
Detailed Description:
Nulliparous women with obstetric indications for induction of labor who were induced with a dinoprostone insert and failed to go into labor after 24 hours from the beginning of labor induction and a BISHOP score of less than 5 will receive a thorough explanation regarding the study and sign informed consent The eligible women will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups Induction with a cervical ripening balloon versus induction with a 2nd dinoprostone insert Relevant demographic and medical information will be gathered from the patients electronic files
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None