Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:13 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:45 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04553328
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-09-17
First Post:
2020-08-14
Brief Title:
Ultrasound-guided Ipsilateral Transverse Abdominis Plane and Ilioinguinal Iliohypogastric Nerve Block
Sponsor:
Ain Shams University
Organization:
Ain Shams University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ultrasound-guided Ipsilateral Transverse Abdominis Plane and Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric Nerve Block Versus Ipsilateral Illioinguinal- Illiohypogastric Nerve Block for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of using TAB and ILIH nerve blocks versus ILIH nerve block only for inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis
Detailed Description:
After obtaining institutional ethical committee approval and written informed consent in 2019 60 patients between the age of 40 and 70 year were divided randomly using a computer generated randomization table and opaque sealed envelopes into two groups 30 patients in each group according to the type of block they received Group T received ultrasound guided US combined ipsilateral transverse abdominis plane TAB and ilioinguinal- iliohypogastric ILIH nerve block Group I received US guided ipsilateral illioinguinal- illiohypogastric nerve block only
Standard monitoring was used throughout the surgery heart rate HR non-invasive mean arterial blood pressure MAP respiratory rate RR and oxygen saturation SpO2documented at baseline before the block then at 5-min intervals intraoperative then during the immediate postoperative period at 15 and 30 min and at discharge from the PACU
A nasal prong was applied and supplemental oxygen at 3 lmin of fresh gas flow was given throughout the procedure It was explained clearly to the patients that any pain discomfort or anxiety would be managed by the administration of local anesthetic LA infiltration with bupivacaine 025 during the operation or by conversion to general anesthesia GA if needed
Standard monitoring was used throughout the surgery heart rate HR non-invasive mean arterial blood pressure MAP respiratory rate RR and oxygen saturation SpO2documented at baseline before the block then at 5-min intervals intraoperative then during the immediate postoperative period at 15 and 30 min and at discharge from the PACU
A nasal prong was applied and supplemental oxygen at 3 lmin of fresh gas flow was given throughout the procedure It was explained clearly to the patients that any pain discomfort or anxiety would be managed by the administration of local anesthetic LA infiltration with bupivacaine 025 during the operation or by conversion to general anesthesia GA if needed
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None