Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:04 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:42 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04515069
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-08-17
First Post:
2020-08-13
Brief Title:
Survival of Hybrid Laminate Veneers Using Two Different Tooth Preparation TechniquesRandomized Clinical Trial
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Cairo University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Survival of a Recent Polymer- Infiltrated Ceramic Network Laminate Veneer Material Using Aesthetic Preevaluative Temporary APT Technique Versus Traditional Technique in the Aesthetic ZoneRandomized Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of laminate veneers constructed using a recent polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material following the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary APT technique of tooth preparation in comparison to traditional technique
Detailed Description:
Six recruited patients 4 females 2 males ranging from 20-30 years old and with mean age 246 years who needed indirect laminate veneer restorations were included in this study Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Fixed ProsthodonticsFaculty of Dentistry Cairo University The participants received a total of 54 laminate veneers between April 2017 and February 2018 Written informed consent was acquired from all participating patients Randomization was done using a computer generated 2 column list by the aid of Randomorg in a 11 ratio Allocation concealment was achieved using numbered cards in opaque sealed envelopes Aluminium foil was placed inside the envelope to render the envelope impermeable to intense light These envelopes were placed in a box and each participant was allowed to grasp one envelop the day of operation Allocation concealment was performed by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial This study is a single blinded study as the assessor was blinded to the assigned study groups Blinding of the participants was not applicable as one of the techniques required extra visits Blinding of the operator was not applicable as one clinician performed the tooth preparation in both techniquesA total of 54 laminate veneers were divided into two equal groups n27 according to the technique of tooth preparation group T traditional technique and group A aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique VITA ENAMIC material was used for CADCAM construction of laminate veneers Cementation was performed using a light cured resin cement The laminate veneers were evaluated at baseline after 3 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service USPHS criteriea The data was collected tabulated and statistically analyzed
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None