Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 2:56 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04477317
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-03-14
First Post:
2020-07-13
Brief Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of 4Alexadricaine Versus 2 Mepicaine-L in Children
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Cairo University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of 4Alexadricaine Versus 2 Mepicaine-L for Infiltration Anesthesia in Extraction of Maxillary First Primary Molars in Children
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the anesthetic efficacy of Alexadricaine versus Mepecaine-L infiltration anesthesia in children during extraction of badly decayed or unrestorable maxillary first primary molars
Detailed Description:
To our knowledge no clinical trials in literature have been done to compare anesthetic efficacy of 4 Articaine versus 2 Mepivacaine in pain management during extraction of badly decayed upper first primary molars Thus the purpose of the present study was to fill this knowledge gap
This trial will be held on a new brand of 4 articaine made in Egypt called Alexadricaine anesthetic solution where no clinical trials have been conducted on it yet in literature
This trial will be held on a new brand of 4 articaine made in Egypt called Alexadricaine anesthetic solution where no clinical trials have been conducted on it yet in literature
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None