Viewing Study NCT01464268


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:28 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 9:56 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01464268
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-02-08
First Post: 2011-11-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia
Sponsor: Cornea and Laser Eye Institute
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) has been proposed as an effective method of reducing progression of both keratoconus and corneal ectasia after surgery, as well as possibly decreasing the steepness of the cornea in these pathologies. During previous studies of the CXL procedure, the surface epithelial cells have been removed. Transepithelial crosslinking in which the epithelium is not removed has been proposed to offer a number of advantages over traditional crosslinking including an increased safety profile by reducing the risk for infection as no epithelial barrier will be broken, faster visual recovery and improved patient comfort in the early postoperative healing period.
Detailed Description: The objective of this study is to investigate the difference between two regimens of transepithelial crosslinking. The study will compare two riboflavin dosing regimens during the crosslinking procedure. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking performed with riboflavin 0.1% for reducing corneal curvature. Safety and efficacy outcomes will then be compared between the treatment groups. In particular, we will compare the two groups with regard to their efficacy in reducing corneal curvature. Secondary outcomes will include visual acuity. Safety assessments will include a tabulation of adverse events, patient symptoms, loss of visual acuity, changes in endothelial cell density, slit lamp examination of the cornea and lens, and contact lens tolerance for contact lens wearers

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: