Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 7:59 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06097650
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-07-24
First Post:
2023-10-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
Sponsor:
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for the Resection of Small Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Endoscopic resection of pedunculated polyps mainly focuses on how to prevent bleeding, and also needs to pay attention to the convenience of resection and the integrity of resection, which means that different endoscopic resection strategies should be adopted for pedunculated polyps with different stalk sizes. Small pedunculated polyps with heads smaller than 20mm and stalks less than or equal to 5mm are defined as having a relatively small risk of bleeding. Preliminary studies in recent years suggest that the use of cold snare polypectomy for small pedunculated polyps may also be a safe resection strategy. However, for small pedunculated polyps, ASGE and ESGE guidelines currently recommend hot snare polypectomy in the middle and lower pedicles (evidence level medium). Therefore, the provision of high-quality clinical evidence related to cold resection techniques in the resection strategy of small pedunculated polyps may provide a basis for revision of guidelines.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: