Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 7:14 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04282850
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-06-23
First Post:
2020-02-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ablation Versus Medical Management of Atrial Fibrillation in HFpEF
Sponsor:
Johns Hopkins University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ablation Versus Medical Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection fRaction and the Effects on Exercise Capacity (AMPERE)
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-06
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
AMPERE
Brief Summary:
This is a prospective non-blinded randomized control pilot study comparing the effect of pulmonary vein isolation against medical management of atrial fibrillation in patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).
Detailed Description:
Recent studies using PVI for rhythm control in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have shown improvement in systolic ejection fraction, exercise capacity, quality of life, and a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. The PVI procedure has been shown to be safe and comparably effective in treating Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in HFpEF patients, but no studies have yet demonstrated the effects of catheter ablation on exercise capacity or clinical outcomes.
The investigators propose a prospective, non-blinded randomized control pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting larger scale studies to determine if there are differences between catheter ablation with medical management on exercise capacity and quality of life in HFpEF patients with AF. The investigators' study will be powered for AF burden reduction, and the investigators hope to use the effect size on exercise capacity and heart failure events to help determine power for larger clinical studies that will follow to shed light on how invasive management of atrial fibrillation may impact the natural history of individuals with these two cardiovascular conditions.
The investigators propose a prospective, non-blinded randomized control pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting larger scale studies to determine if there are differences between catheter ablation with medical management on exercise capacity and quality of life in HFpEF patients with AF. The investigators' study will be powered for AF burden reduction, and the investigators hope to use the effect size on exercise capacity and heart failure events to help determine power for larger clinical studies that will follow to shed light on how invasive management of atrial fibrillation may impact the natural history of individuals with these two cardiovascular conditions.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: