Viewing Study NCT07242950


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:22 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-02 @ 8:15 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07242950
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-11-21
First Post: 2025-09-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effect of Elimination Diet on Intestinal Mucus Barrier in Infants With Cow's Milk Protein Allergy
Sponsor: Baskent University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Evaluation of the Effect of Elimination Diet on Intestinal Mucus Barrier in Infants Diagnosed With Cow's Milk Protein Allergy
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2025-11
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effects of cow's milk protein elimination diets on breastfed infants under 26 weeks of age with newly diagnosed non-IgE-mediated CMPA. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does a cow's milk protein elimination diet improve clinical symptoms (CoMiSS scores), growth parameters, and gut immune markers (MUC2 and sIgA) in breastfed infants with CMPA?

Participants included breastfed infants under 26 weeks diagnosed with non-IgE-mediated CMPA and healthy age- and sex-matched controls without allergies. Infants and their mothers were followed prospectively. Data were collected at baseline and at the end of the study through face-to-face surveys with mothers, three-day food records, anthropometric measurements, CoMiSS evaluations, and stool samples. Mothers in the CMPA group received education on elimination diets, calcium supplementation, and complementary feeding guidance, while the control group received only complementary feeding guidance. Stool samples were analyzed for MUC2 and sIgA using ELISA.
Detailed Description: The study included breastfed babies under 26 weeks of age who were diagnosed with new non-IgE-mediated CMPA by an allergist, had an elimination diet, and applied to two hospitals designated in Türkiye. Infants and their mothers without allergies or atopic diseases, similar in age and gender, were in the control group. According to the power analysis performed with G\*Power, a total of 32 infants were needed to detect a medium-sized difference with a 5% type I error rate and 85% power. The study began with 20 infants with CMPA and 18 healthy infants. Following dietary noncompliance and withdrawals, the study concluded with 17 infants in each group.

Data were collected at two time points: the beginning and end of the study. At each point, face-to-face surveys were administered to mothers, three-day food records were obtained for both mothers and infants, and infants' anthropometric measurements, Cow's Milk Protein-related Symptom Scores (CoMiSS), and stool samples were collected.

Mothers in the case group received detailed training on cow's milk protein (CMP) elimination diets and complementary feeding and were supplemented with 1000 mg/day of calcium. The control group received only complementary feeding guidance. Monthly follow-ups were conducted to monitor compliance. The elimination diet in the case group was prescribed and supervised by a dietitian, with reintroduction following the "milk ladder" protocol after an average of 1.9±0.79 months. In the control group, final assessments were performed three months after baseline. At study completion, all initial measurements were repeated, and a second stool sample was collected.

Infants' body weight (kg), length (cm) and head circumference (cm) measurements were taken by a physician using a standardized scale, infantometer and non-stretch tape measure, in accordance with the method recommended by the World Health Organisation. Anthropometric measurements \[length-for-age (LFA), weight-for-age (WFA), weight-for-length (WFL) and head circumference-for-age (HCFA)\] were assessed using the WHO ANTHRO Software according to Z-scores (z-score=patient's value-mean value/standard deviation).

Three-day food records (two weekdays, one weekend day) were collected from mothers and infants. Mothers' records were used to assess adherence to the elimination diet, and participants consuming dairy during the diet were excluded. Portion sizes were estimated using a portion size picture book. Daily energy and nutrient intakes were analyzed using BeBiS software (version 9.0). Infants' intakes were evaluated against Adequate Intake (AI) reference values from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). Breast milk intake was estimated using the ALSPAC method: 100 mL for feeds \>10 minutes and 50 mL for feeds \<5 minutes, with reference values of 780 mL/day for 0-6 months and 600 mL/day for 7-12 months.

The clinical symptoms of infants were assessed using CoMiSS. CoMiSS is a scoring system that assesses crying, regurgitation, stool type (Bristol stool scale), skin and respiratory symptoms, with a total score ranging from 0 to 33.

Stool samples were collected in a container with a spoon at the beginning and end of the study to ensure an adequate quantity (≥50 mg) was obtained. The samples were stored at -80°C to prevent loss of bioactivity and contamination. MUC2 and sIgA analyses were performed using the sandwich enzyme immunoassay method with Human MUC2 and Human sIgA ELISA kits via the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The Human MUC2 ELISA kit has a sensitivity of 0.57 ng/mL and a measurement range of 1.57-100 ng/mL. The Human sIgA ELISA kit has a sensitivity of 0.098 µg/mL and a measurement range of 0.312-20 µg/mL. According to the analysis protocol, samples and standards were added in duplicate to microtiter wells. Then, biotin-conjugated specific antibody and avidin-HRP conjugate were applied. After the color developed with the TMB substrate, the reaction was stopped with a stop solution containing sulfuric acid. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450±10 nm. Concentrations were then calculated using a standard curve based on the obtained optical density values.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: