Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 1:54 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 1:21 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04153825
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2019-11-06
First Post:
2019-10-30
Brief Title:
Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Different Electrotherapy Agents on Central Sensitization
Sponsor:
Turkish League Against Rheumatism
Organization:
Turkish League Against Rheumatism
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation TENS and Interferential Currents IFC on Central Sensitization in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2019-11
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation TENS interferential currents IFCs and sham devices in improving central sensitization CS findings including pressure pain thresholds pain catastrophizing depression and kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis OA
Detailed Description:
Knee OA which is the most frequently encountered type of OA is a leading cause of disability and chronic pain CS is as important as nociceptive component in the pathogenesis of OA-related pain Therefore the necessary interventions for CS should be also considered when deciding the treatment protocolTENS and IFC have been safely and commonly employed in the conservative treatment of knee OA However there are limited and inconsistent data concerning the impact of these modalities on CS component of painTherefore the aim of this study is to investigate whether these agents are effective on CS and they are superior to each other
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None