Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:09 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 7:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06886750
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-03-20
First Post:
2025-02-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Effects of Waning of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
Sponsor:
Western University, Canada
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Investigation of Waning Time in Patients with Cervical Dystonia Converted to Botulinum Toxin a
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The main treatment for cervical dystonia is botulinum toxin injections. However, some patients receiving this treatment after many years tend to experience short duration of benefit. Typically, botulinum toxin brands used in clinic are Botox or Xeomin. Another type of botulinum toxin is called Dysport (Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals), and Dysport may increase duration of benefit from the injections. The study is selecting patients from the investigator's clinics who are not satisfied with the duration of their treatment and are willing to switch to Dysport and the investigators will monitor if Dysport will increase the duration of benefit over a total of 3 treatments. A group of patients will be switched to Dysport while another group will remain on their original botulinum toxin formulation. The patients will be unaware of the treatment switch and hence are considered to be blinded. The investigators will not be blinded. Treatments are given every 3 months. All study visits will occur at the local sites of the 3 recruiting sites.
Detailed Description:
Cervical dystonia (CD) is a disabling and often painful condition clinically characterized by abnormal neck and head postures and movements often associated with tremor and chronic pain. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is an effective and safe first-line therapy for CD. However, in a recent patient perspective survey, symptom re-emergence between injections (a mean 10.5 weeks) was reported in 88% of patients with a waning time of ≤8 weeks in one-third of patients. Waning treatment effects prior to re-injection reduces quality of life as 47% of patients are somewhat satisfied, and 39% were not satisfied with their therapy as symptoms may follow a "yo-yo" pattern . 45% of patients would prefer a ≤10-week treatment cycle due to the short therapeutic response. However, practicality of injecting patients more frequently and concerns about potential immunologically mediated resistance to BoNT-A has resulted in a standard of treating at intervals of at least 12 weeks. Thus, a significant unmet need is a long-lasting therapy that delays symptom re-emergence and may improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.
Nine published clinical studies have studied the direct comparison between Botox and Dysport in CD patients and authors concluded that a simple dose-conversion factor is not applicable as the ratio for Botox to Dysport was extremely variable, ranging from 1.2 to 13.3. Yun et al demonstrated that conversion to Dysport using a Botox:Dysport ratio of 1:2.5 was not inferior to Botox. A double blind, crossover study lasting 3 injection cycles studied 2 ratios (1:3 and 1:4) and found at both conversion ratios, Dysport was superior to Botox in terms of symptom reduction and duration of effect, although higher frequency of adverse effects such as dysphagia was reported. More recently, a double-blind, randomized crossover study evaluated 2 conversion ratios (1:3 and 1:1.7) that did not show any differences in efficacy in the short term, but the effect of Botox was reduced after 3 months. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in efficacy between abobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA (1:3) was observed, suggesting a shorter duration of effect for the latter when this ratio (at low dose) was used. Thus, in this research study, the objective is to determine if conversion ratio of 1:2.5 (Botox:Dysport) from the patient's optimized, stable treatment (either Botox or Xeomin) can increase duration of BoNT-A efficacy.
A pilot study published by our research group reported a significant increase in waning time and efficacy following the conversion to aboBoNT-A in 27 CD patients who had a waning time of ≤8-weeks on their original BoNT-A formulation (either onaBoNT-A/incoBoNT-A). The results of the pilot study were limited by the lack of participant blinding and absence of a control group. Thus, a randomized, controlled, single-blind study will be conducted to determine whether the conversion to aboBoNT-A affects waning time, clinical outcomes and treatment satisfaction in patients experiencing early waning with ona/incoBoNT-A.
Nine published clinical studies have studied the direct comparison between Botox and Dysport in CD patients and authors concluded that a simple dose-conversion factor is not applicable as the ratio for Botox to Dysport was extremely variable, ranging from 1.2 to 13.3. Yun et al demonstrated that conversion to Dysport using a Botox:Dysport ratio of 1:2.5 was not inferior to Botox. A double blind, crossover study lasting 3 injection cycles studied 2 ratios (1:3 and 1:4) and found at both conversion ratios, Dysport was superior to Botox in terms of symptom reduction and duration of effect, although higher frequency of adverse effects such as dysphagia was reported. More recently, a double-blind, randomized crossover study evaluated 2 conversion ratios (1:3 and 1:1.7) that did not show any differences in efficacy in the short term, but the effect of Botox was reduced after 3 months. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in efficacy between abobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA (1:3) was observed, suggesting a shorter duration of effect for the latter when this ratio (at low dose) was used. Thus, in this research study, the objective is to determine if conversion ratio of 1:2.5 (Botox:Dysport) from the patient's optimized, stable treatment (either Botox or Xeomin) can increase duration of BoNT-A efficacy.
A pilot study published by our research group reported a significant increase in waning time and efficacy following the conversion to aboBoNT-A in 27 CD patients who had a waning time of ≤8-weeks on their original BoNT-A formulation (either onaBoNT-A/incoBoNT-A). The results of the pilot study were limited by the lack of participant blinding and absence of a control group. Thus, a randomized, controlled, single-blind study will be conducted to determine whether the conversion to aboBoNT-A affects waning time, clinical outcomes and treatment satisfaction in patients experiencing early waning with ona/incoBoNT-A.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: