Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:08 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 2:16 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07034950
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-11
First Post:
2025-05-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effective Dose and Safety of Esketamine During Ultrasound-guided Hepatic Tumor Thermal Ablation
Sponsor:
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Study on the Effective Dose and Safety of Esketamine During Ultrasound-guided Hepatic Tumor Thermal Ablation Under Hilar Nerve Blockade
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Effective pain management during percutaneous thermal ablation of liver tumors outside the operating room remains a significant challenge. While hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB) provides partial analgesia, its incomplete efficacy often requires opioid supplementation, potentially increasing perioperative risks. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, exhibits unique dual analgesic-sedative properties that may address this therapeutic gap, thus obviating the necessity for opioids. This prospective dose-finding study aimed to establish the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of esketamine for opioid-free analgesia during ultrasound-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors under HHNB. Afterwards, the investigators will conduct an RCT study to evaluate the safety of the dose of esketamine ED95 through the incidence of respiratory depression.
Detailed Description:
This research will be divided into two stages.
(i) In Phase one, a prospective dose discovery study using the Dixon sequential method will be conducted, aiming to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of esketamine during ultrasound-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors under hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB). Esketamine will be initiated by intravenous drip at 0.3 mg∙kg-1, and then based on the patient's response to pain (positive: body movement or complaint of pain; Negative: No body movement or no reported pain. The dose will be adjusted, with a fluctuation step of 0.02 mg∙kg-1 up and down. All patients will receive a standardized anesthesia regimen, including the administration of midazolam at 0.03 mg∙kg-1 and hepatic portal nerve block (10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine) under ultrasound guidance. Local anaesthesia will be administered using 10 ml of 1% lidocaine, which will be applied until the liver capsule is reached. The test will continue until six cross-pairings will be obtained. Probabilistic regression analysis will be used to calculate the ED50 and ED95 of esketamine with a 95% confidence interval.
(ii) The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, double-blind controlled trial in Phase Two to evaluate the safety of the esketamine ED95 dose under the monitoring anesthesia care program based on the incidence of respiratory depression. The intervention group will be injected with the dose of esketamine ED95; the control group will be first injected with fentanyl at a dose of 1 μg∙kg-1. Both groups of patients will receive the same anesthesia regimen, namely midazolam 0.03 mg∙kg-1, and hepatic portal nerve block (0.5% ropivacaine 10 ml) will be performed under ultrasound guidance. Intravenous injection of 100 mg of flurbiprofen axetil for auxiliary analgesia. Intravenous injection of 4 mg of ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting.
(i) In Phase one, a prospective dose discovery study using the Dixon sequential method will be conducted, aiming to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of esketamine during ultrasound-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors under hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB). Esketamine will be initiated by intravenous drip at 0.3 mg∙kg-1, and then based on the patient's response to pain (positive: body movement or complaint of pain; Negative: No body movement or no reported pain. The dose will be adjusted, with a fluctuation step of 0.02 mg∙kg-1 up and down. All patients will receive a standardized anesthesia regimen, including the administration of midazolam at 0.03 mg∙kg-1 and hepatic portal nerve block (10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine) under ultrasound guidance. Local anaesthesia will be administered using 10 ml of 1% lidocaine, which will be applied until the liver capsule is reached. The test will continue until six cross-pairings will be obtained. Probabilistic regression analysis will be used to calculate the ED50 and ED95 of esketamine with a 95% confidence interval.
(ii) The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, double-blind controlled trial in Phase Two to evaluate the safety of the esketamine ED95 dose under the monitoring anesthesia care program based on the incidence of respiratory depression. The intervention group will be injected with the dose of esketamine ED95; the control group will be first injected with fentanyl at a dose of 1 μg∙kg-1. Both groups of patients will receive the same anesthesia regimen, namely midazolam 0.03 mg∙kg-1, and hepatic portal nerve block (0.5% ropivacaine 10 ml) will be performed under ultrasound guidance. Intravenous injection of 100 mg of flurbiprofen axetil for auxiliary analgesia. Intravenous injection of 4 mg of ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: