Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:05 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-04 @ 10:11 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07140250
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-24
First Post:
2025-08-18
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Using ChatGPT to Help Guide Treatment for Sinus and Nasal Problems
Sponsor:
Carol Yan
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Shared Decision-Making With ChatGPT for Patients With Sinusitis and Nasal Obstruction
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether ChatGPT can improve shared decision-making by increasing treatment-related knowledge and reducing decisional conflict in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or nasal obstruction who have been deemed candidates for surgery.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does ChatGPT improve patient understanding of CRS/nasal obstruction treatment options compared to widely utilized web searches?
* Does ChatGPT reduce decisional conflict regarding surgical versus medical management compared to traditional search engine? Researchers will compare a group using Google (standard internet search with AI turned off) after standard counseling to a group using ChatGPT after standard counseling to see if ChatGPT leads to higher knowledge scores, lower decisional conflict scores, and higher satisfaction with the information platform.
Participants will:
* Complete baseline surveys assessing demographics, treatment-related knowledge, and decisional conflict
* Be randomized to use either Google or ChatGPT to research their surgery for 10 minutes after standard in-office counseling
* Complete follow-up surveys assessing knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the information source
* Allow the research team to review their medical record for relevant clinical history and disease-specific quality-of-life scores (SNOT-22)
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does ChatGPT improve patient understanding of CRS/nasal obstruction treatment options compared to widely utilized web searches?
* Does ChatGPT reduce decisional conflict regarding surgical versus medical management compared to traditional search engine? Researchers will compare a group using Google (standard internet search with AI turned off) after standard counseling to a group using ChatGPT after standard counseling to see if ChatGPT leads to higher knowledge scores, lower decisional conflict scores, and higher satisfaction with the information platform.
Participants will:
* Complete baseline surveys assessing demographics, treatment-related knowledge, and decisional conflict
* Be randomized to use either Google or ChatGPT to research their surgery for 10 minutes after standard in-office counseling
* Complete follow-up surveys assessing knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the information source
* Allow the research team to review their medical record for relevant clinical history and disease-specific quality-of-life scores (SNOT-22)
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: