Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:05 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 12:36 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03774550
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-05-14
First Post:
2018-12-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Radiofrequency or Cryoablation?
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With or Without Contact-force and Cryoablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ARCFA
Brief Summary:
The study aims to compare 3 techniques routinely used for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: radiofrequency catheter ablation without contact-force, radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact-force and cryoablation. The hypothesis is the non-inferiority between the 3 techniques in terms of free-from atrial fibrillation survival (primary criteria). It will also compare lenght of procedure, radioscopy time and immediate complications (secondary criteria).
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: