Viewing Study NCT04000035



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 1:22 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 1:12 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04000035
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-11-28
First Post: 2019-06-11

Brief Title: Health in Work - a Measure for Increased Coping and Work Inclusion
Sponsor: University Hospital of North Norway
Organization: University Hospital of North Norway

Study Overview

Official Title: Health in Work - a Measure for Increased Coping and Work Inclusion - An Analysis of Effect of Preventive Information Given at the Workplace - Part 1 Quantitative Data Collection
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-11
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: HiAforsk
Brief Summary: Health in work - a measure for increased coping and work participation

-An effect analysis of a health- and work environment intervention at the workplace Part 1quantitative data collection

The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the workplace intervention in the new Norwegian national programme Health in work HelseIArbeid through a pragmatic cluster-randomized study

The main hypothesis is that this interdisciplinary health and welfare intervention at the workplace reduces sick leave and improves mastering of common health problems more efficiently than a conventional welfare intervention More specifically it is hypothesized that the Health in work intervention has a better cost-effectiveness in terms of sick leave use of health services and coping with common health problems indicated by an increased health-related quality of life
Detailed Description: The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the workplace intervention in the new Norwegian national concept Health in work HelseIArbeid through a pragmatic cluster-randomized study

The interdisciplinary Health in work intervention consists of three information sessions over the course of one year with work place processes in between In the meetings structured health information about musculoskeletal- and mental disorders is given and put in the context of working and the specific workplace This includes possibilities to work despite health impairment work inclusion measures and discussion on how these could have an influence on the individual group management and organizational level The process involves the workplaces entire staff employers and employees It is an active process and workplaces are stimulated and expected to continue to work with these topics both between sessions and after the last meeting The interdisciplinary intervention is carried out in a collaboration of qualified personnel from The Norwegian labour and welfare service NAV and qualified health personnel from the hospital department of rehabilitation medicine

The main hypothesis is that this interdisciplinary health and welfare intervention at the workplace reduces sick leave and improves mastering of common health problems more efficiently than a conventional welfare intervention Conventional workplace measures are given by personnel of NAV workplace service without specialist healthcare involvement focusing mainly on work inclusion and psychosocial work environment There are several types of interventions available and they will be customized to the workplace This means that the control intervention is not standardized and will be varying according to the workplaces demands

Participating workplaces are recruited through NAVs conventional contact with workplaces based on an analysis of the workplaces needs In the workplaces or workplace units that are interested in participating in the project the following will be distributed to all staff- including leaders- through the employers email-list Information about the project the informed consent-form and a link to the first electronic questionnaire Q1 The electronic questionnaire portal is open to answers for two weeks after the initial email After this time period the workplaces are randomized to either Health in work or control intervention A one year intervention period follows as described above The questionnaire is repeated 12 months Q2 and 24 months Q3 after randomization Q1-3 include the same questions regarding health complaints health mastering health related quality of life and work environment

Work participation will be assessed at the unit level by data from the employers sickness absence registers that include both self- and physician-certified sickness absence Physician-certified sickness absence at the individual level will be gathered from the National register of sickness absence over a four year period from 2 years before randomization to 2 years after Individual sickness absence will also be assessed by self-report from the questionnaires considering the last three months prior to the questionnaire

Data on healthcare utilization at the individual level will be obtained as self-reported data from the questionnaires as well as objective data from the national register of control and health service refunds KUHR database and the Norwegian Patient Register NPR These registers include registrations of visits to general practitioners emergency clinics physiotherapists radiologic- laboratory- and psychologypsychiatry and other specialised healthcare services The study will use the registers data on number of consultations and costs related to these

All stakeholders involved in the interventions workplacesworkplace units specialist healthcare service and NAV will keep records of the time used on the interventions attendance preparation implementation supplementary work others Costs related to the different interventions will be assessed from these reports

Other outcome measures are based on self-reported questionnaire data including health-related quality of life self-rated health psychosocial work environment subjective health complaints health anxiety social support and job satisfaction described in more detail in the outcome section

Health-economics analyses will be performed on these data in order to determine the cost-effectiveness in terms of sick leave use of health services and coping with common health problems indicated by an increased health-related quality of life

This project has a second part not registered here gathering qualitative data about the Health in work intervention This will investigate how the intervention works what the participants impression of the intervention is and how the intervention can best be implemented considering its planned future nationwide application

CHANGE FROM 2020 Due to the global pandemic the study was completely halted for a period of 6 months from mid-March through September 2020 Activity was slowly regained after that but remained on a lower level than normal fluctuating with changing infection rates in the region Due to this there were delays in both collection of informed-consent forms and allocation of workplace units and the intervention period was prolonged Consequently the time-frame between questionnaires one and two was expanded in collaboration with the reference group and approved by the steering committee For units included before March 12th 2020 questionnaire Q2 and Q3 will be delayed by 12 months in order to assure that intervention activities can be carried out For units included in the second half of 2020 the scheduled delay of questionnaire Q2 and Q3 will be 6 months Units included in 2021 are expected to follow the one year intervention plan We will take this into consideration in the final statistical analysis

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None