Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 4:54 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:25 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00343122
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2007-09-17
First Post:
2006-06-20
Brief Title:
Echocardiographic Assessment of Intrapulmonary Vasodilatation Agitated Saline Versus Polygeline
Sponsor:
Medical University of Vienna
Organization:
Medical University of Vienna
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of Two Methods for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Intrapulmonary Vasodilatation in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Agitated Saline Versus Polygelatine
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2007-09
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of the study is to evaluate agitated saline versus polygeline for detection of intrapulmonary vasodilatation in patients with cirrhosis
Detailed Description:
Intrapulmonary vasodilatation is a frequent finding in patients with cirrhosis Its diagnosis is established via contrast enhanced echocardiography One used method is the contrast agent agitated saline and another frequently used method is the contrast agent polygeline The purpose of this study is to compare these two echocardiographic contrast agents with respect to their ability to detect intrapulmonary vasodilatation
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None