Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00963950
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-01-17
First Post:
2009-08-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Transvaginal Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Biliary Colic
Sponsor:
Yale University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
A safe and effective transvaginal approach accessing the abdominal cavity through the vagina rather than the abdominal wall is today considered a routine approach for many gynecologic surgeries.
First described by Dr. Ott in Germany in 1901, it is used routinely for transvaginal surgery, for example, transvaginal hysterectomies. This transvaginal technique has been shown to compare favorably to a laparoscopic abdominal approach because of less postoperative pain, the total elimination of abdominal wall hernias and wound infections, earlier recovery and better cosmesis.
Although routinely used in gynecological surgery, the advantages of the vaginal approach have not been utilized for general surgery applications such as cholecystectomies. Open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy accessing the abdominal cavity through abdominal wall incisions is currently still considered the standard of care in general surgery for patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease.
The investigators intend to access the abdominal cavity through the posterior vaginal fornix instead of the transabdominal approach that is now performed routinely. So far, this method of accessing the abdominal cavity through the transvaginal approach for the purpose of performing intraabdominal general surgery.
The investigators' transvaginal approach has the strong potential to further decrease invasiveness and take minimally invasive surgery to the next level in order to benefit the patient even more by minimizing postoperative pain, eliminating the risk of abdominal hernias and wound infections, improving cosmetic appearance and enabling the patient to return to routine activity and work earlier. First preliminary studies show these advantages but further research needs to be done to confirm these early positive results.
First described by Dr. Ott in Germany in 1901, it is used routinely for transvaginal surgery, for example, transvaginal hysterectomies. This transvaginal technique has been shown to compare favorably to a laparoscopic abdominal approach because of less postoperative pain, the total elimination of abdominal wall hernias and wound infections, earlier recovery and better cosmesis.
Although routinely used in gynecological surgery, the advantages of the vaginal approach have not been utilized for general surgery applications such as cholecystectomies. Open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy accessing the abdominal cavity through abdominal wall incisions is currently still considered the standard of care in general surgery for patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease.
The investigators intend to access the abdominal cavity through the posterior vaginal fornix instead of the transabdominal approach that is now performed routinely. So far, this method of accessing the abdominal cavity through the transvaginal approach for the purpose of performing intraabdominal general surgery.
The investigators' transvaginal approach has the strong potential to further decrease invasiveness and take minimally invasive surgery to the next level in order to benefit the patient even more by minimizing postoperative pain, eliminating the risk of abdominal hernias and wound infections, improving cosmetic appearance and enabling the patient to return to routine activity and work earlier. First preliminary studies show these advantages but further research needs to be done to confirm these early positive results.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: