Viewing Study NCT00329888



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 4:50 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:25 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00329888
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2006-05-25
First Post: 2006-05-24

Brief Title: Comparison of Papillary Balloon Dilatation VsSphincterotomy for Lithotripsy in Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering
Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital
Organization: National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation and Sphincterotomy for CBD Stones With Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2006-04
Last Known Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Compare endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in

when sphincterotomy is difficult periampullary diverticulum prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis
when there is distal CBD tapering
Detailed Description: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for treating bile duct stones

easier and as effective But
a higher risk of pancreatitis

Conditions including periampullary diverticulum prior EST Billroth-II anastomosis or distal CBD tapering pose difficulty in EST and lithotripsy with increased risk of complications

Whether EPBD or EST is superior in efficacy or safety under such circumstances is not clear

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None