Viewing Study NCT01190566


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:44 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 4:01 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01190566
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2015-07-07
First Post: 2010-08-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: PET-MR for Prediction and Monitoring of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: PET-MR Fusion Imaging and Surrogate Marker for Prediction and Monitoring of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2015-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is:

To validate the efficacy of multiparametric MRI, FDG-PET, RGD-PET, and PET-MR fusion imaging in the prediction and monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer patients.

To identify the optimal combination parameters of MR spectroscopy, diffusion-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, FDG-PET, and RGD-PET in the prediction and monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer patients.

To compare the performances of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using parametric response map analysis versus those of pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, kep, or Ve) in the early prediction of pathological responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
Detailed Description: Enrolled women with breast cancers who had received an anthracycline-taxane regimen and subsequent surgery were prospectively enrolled. DCE-MRI and FDG-PET scan were performed before and after the 1st cycle of chemotherapy. MR imaging parameters and SUV on PET scan within a tumor were analyzed. Clinicopathologic (age, clinical tumor stage, hormonal receptor status, and surgery type) and imaging parameters were compared according to the pathological response.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: