Viewing Study NCT06230666


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:44 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 8:12 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06230666
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-03-13
First Post: 2023-12-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Single-isocenter SBRT vs. Multiple-isocenter SBRT for Multiple Extracranial Metastases
Sponsor: Matthias Guckenberger
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Single-isocenter SBRT vs. Multiple-isocenter SBRT for Multiple Extracranial Metastases: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Clinical Trial
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this randomized non-inferiority clinical trial is to investigate whether single-isocenter SBRT using one treatment plan is similarly effective as multiple-isocenter SBRT using multiple treatment plans for multiple extracranial metastases. The main question it aims to answer is:

\- whether 1-year freedom from local disease progression at the site of treated metastases after single-isocenter SBRT is non-inferior against multiple-isocenter SBRT at the same prescription doses.

Cancer patients with multiple extracranial distant metastases will be randomly assigned and treated either with single-isocenter SBRT or multiple-isocenter SBRT.
Detailed Description: Treatment planning of SBRT for multiple metastases usually employs multiple isocenters, one for each target, resulting in multiple treatment plans. Execution of such treatments requires sequential multiple setups and treatment plan verifications. This practice complicates the workflow of SBRT planning and delivery and makes target-by-target treatment lengthy and patient compliance and comfort suboptimal. The investigators hypothesized that single-isocenter SBRT for extracranial multiple metastases is non-inferior in terms of local efficacy as compared to multiple-isocenter SBRT at the same radiation dose prescription.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: