Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 11:43 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 12:49 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03585166
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-07-12
First Post:
2018-04-24
Brief Title:
Nursing Fro Laparoscopic vs Open Hepatectomy
Sponsor:
Wuhan Union Hospital China
Organization:
Wuhan Union Hospital China
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Efficacy and Nursing Between Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy observation group and laparoscopic hepatectomy control groupCompared two groups of age sex body mass index BMI tumor diameter number of tumors singlemultiple pathologic characteristics HBsAg positivenegative liver function AFP Child - Pugh grading nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery surgical incision length intraoperative blood intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume operation time the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation death cases for the first time the meal time anus exhaust time analgesic bed first time the abdominal cavity drainage tube time length of hospital stay postoperative days and liver function indexFollow-up the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months one year two years three years and five yearsIn this study the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases plus 20 inefficiencies the final initial selection of 36 cases and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 casesThe research date starts on October 1 2017
Detailed Description:
Research design and methods
This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy observation group and laparoscopic hepatectomy control groupCompared two groups of age sex body mass index BMI tumor diameter number of tumors singlemultiple pathologic characteristics HBsAg positivenegative liver function AFP Child - Pugh grading nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery surgical incision length intraoperative blood intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume operation time the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation death cases for the first time the meal time anus exhaust time analgesic bed first time the abdominal cavity drainage tube time length of hospital stay postoperative days and liver function indexFollow-up the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months one year two years three years and five yearsIn this study the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases plus 20 inefficiencies the final initial selection of 36 cases and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases
Statistical methods by means of SPSS 230 to analyze the data all data after the normal test to choose the appropriate statistical methods the normal distribution of measurement data in the two groups use surgery and postoperative recovery using two sets of samples t test liver function index using analysis of variance non-normal distribution using nonparametric test count data chi-square test P 005 for the difference was statistically significantSurvival analysis was performed on two groups of patientsThe research date starts on October 1 2017
This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy observation group and laparoscopic hepatectomy control groupCompared two groups of age sex body mass index BMI tumor diameter number of tumors singlemultiple pathologic characteristics HBsAg positivenegative liver function AFP Child - Pugh grading nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery surgical incision length intraoperative blood intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume operation time the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation death cases for the first time the meal time anus exhaust time analgesic bed first time the abdominal cavity drainage tube time length of hospital stay postoperative days and liver function indexFollow-up the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months one year two years three years and five yearsIn this study the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases plus 20 inefficiencies the final initial selection of 36 cases and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases
Statistical methods by means of SPSS 230 to analyze the data all data after the normal test to choose the appropriate statistical methods the normal distribution of measurement data in the two groups use surgery and postoperative recovery using two sets of samples t test liver function index using analysis of variance non-normal distribution using nonparametric test count data chi-square test P 005 for the difference was statistically significantSurvival analysis was performed on two groups of patientsThe research date starts on October 1 2017
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None