Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 8:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04582266
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-06-09
First Post:
2020-10-08
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
PK and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women in the US
Sponsor:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women in the United States
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
IMPAACT 2032 was a Phase IV prospective, open label, non-randomized opportunistic study. The objectives of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety of remdesivir (RDV) administered intravenously as part of clinical care among hospitalized pregnant and non-pregnant women of childbearing potential with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). RDV was provided and managed by the participant's treating physician and was not provided as part of this study.
Detailed Description:
IMPAACT 2032 was a Phase IV prospective, open label, non-randomized opportunistic study to evaluate the PK and safety of RDV when administered to pregnant and non-pregnant women of childbearing potential for treatment of COVID-19. Participants were pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalized for COVID-19 who received daily RDV infusions, typically for 5 days but in some cases for up to 10 days, as part of their clinical care. RDV was provided and managed by the participants' treating physician and was not provided as a part of this study.
This study was comprised of two population-based arms: Arm 1 included pregnant women of any gestational age (GA) and Arm 2 included non-pregnant women of childbearing potential, who were between 18 and 45 years of age. The target sample size was 20 PK-evaluable participants per arm. Study sites were located in the United States.
Study procedures for this study were limited to data collection and blood specimens for PK. Except for PK sampling, study procedures were largely done via medical chart abstraction or remote contact/telemedicine visit. Collection of clinical and laboratory data started at 48 hours before the first infusion and continued through 4 weeks after the last infusion. In addition, data were collected at the time of delivery for participants in Arm 1, and limited data were also collected from the birth and newborn exam records of their infants. All participants were followed for safety through 4 weeks after the last infusion; Arm 1 participants who were still pregnant at that time had an additional follow-up at the time of delivery. If there was a gap in time between 4 weeks after the last infusion and delivery, no data were collected during that interval.
No formal statistical comparisons were made between Arm 1 and Arm 2 for primary and secondary objectives. Therefore, all analyses for primary and secondary outcome measures represent single arm evaluations.
This study was comprised of two population-based arms: Arm 1 included pregnant women of any gestational age (GA) and Arm 2 included non-pregnant women of childbearing potential, who were between 18 and 45 years of age. The target sample size was 20 PK-evaluable participants per arm. Study sites were located in the United States.
Study procedures for this study were limited to data collection and blood specimens for PK. Except for PK sampling, study procedures were largely done via medical chart abstraction or remote contact/telemedicine visit. Collection of clinical and laboratory data started at 48 hours before the first infusion and continued through 4 weeks after the last infusion. In addition, data were collected at the time of delivery for participants in Arm 1, and limited data were also collected from the birth and newborn exam records of their infants. All participants were followed for safety through 4 weeks after the last infusion; Arm 1 participants who were still pregnant at that time had an additional follow-up at the time of delivery. If there was a gap in time between 4 weeks after the last infusion and delivery, no data were collected during that interval.
No formal statistical comparisons were made between Arm 1 and Arm 2 for primary and secondary objectives. Therefore, all analyses for primary and secondary outcome measures represent single arm evaluations.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAIDS Study ID 38746 | OTHER | DAIDS CRMS | View |